Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters#125871
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jun 5, 2024
Merged
Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters#125871bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
fmease
commented
Jun 1, 2024
cad4e89 to
f801823
Compare
lcnr
reviewed
Jun 3, 2024
Contributor
lcnr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
some nits, then r=me
thanks
f801823 to
8746703
Compare
Member
Author
|
@bors r=lcnr |
Collaborator
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2024
Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters This fixes an oversight of mine in rust-lang#117164. The change itself has already been FCP'ed. This only affects the old solver, the next solver already correctly rejects the added test since rust-lang#117164. r? `@lcnr`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122192 (Do not try to reveal hidden types when trying to prove Freeze in the defining scope) - rust-lang#124840 (resolve: mark it undetermined if single import is not has any bindings) - rust-lang#125622 (Winnow private method candidates instead of assuming any candidate of the right name will apply) - rust-lang#125871 (Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters) - rust-lang#125893 (Handle all GVN binops in a single place.) - rust-lang#125911 (delete bootstrap build before switching to bumped rustc) - rust-lang#125918 (Revert: create const block bodies in typeck via query feeding) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122192 (Do not try to reveal hidden types when trying to prove Freeze in the defining scope) - rust-lang#124840 (resolve: mark it undetermined if single import is not has any bindings) - rust-lang#125622 (Winnow private method candidates instead of assuming any candidate of the right name will apply) - rust-lang#125871 (Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters) - rust-lang#125893 (Handle all GVN binops in a single place.) - rust-lang#125911 (delete bootstrap build before switching to bumped rustc) - rust-lang#125918 (Revert: create const block bodies in typeck via query feeding) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122192 (Do not try to reveal hidden types when trying to prove Freeze in the defining scope) - rust-lang#124840 (resolve: mark it undetermined if single import is not has any bindings) - rust-lang#125622 (Winnow private method candidates instead of assuming any candidate of the right name will apply) - rust-lang#125871 (Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters) - rust-lang#125893 (Handle all GVN binops in a single place.) - rust-lang#125911 (delete bootstrap build before switching to bumped rustc) - rust-lang#125918 (Revert: create const block bodies in typeck via query feeding) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#124840 (resolve: mark it undetermined if single import is not has any bindings) - rust-lang#125622 (Winnow private method candidates instead of assuming any candidate of the right name will apply) - rust-lang#125648 (Remove unused(?) `~/rustsrc` folder from docker script) - rust-lang#125672 (Add more ABI test cases to miri (RFC 3391)) - rust-lang#125800 (Fix `mut` static task queue in SGX target) - rust-lang#125871 (Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters) - rust-lang#125893 (Handle all GVN binops in a single place.) - rust-lang#126008 (Port `tests/run-make-fulldeps/issue-19371` to ui-fulldeps) - rust-lang#126032 (Update description of the `IsTerminal` example) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 5, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#125871 - fmease:fix-orphanck-opaques, r=lcnr Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters This fixes an oversight of mine in rust-lang#117164. The change itself has already been FCP'ed. This only affects the old solver, the next solver already correctly rejects the added test since rust-lang#117164. r? ``@lcnr``
Member
Author
|
bors sleepy @bors r- |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes an oversight of mine in #117164. The change itself has already been FCP'ed.
This only affects the old solver, the next solver already correctly rejects the added test since #117164.
r? @lcnr