Lazify CRT objects fields initilization

[Urgau]

This PR lazify the CRT objects by introducing MaybeLazy, a 3-way lazy container (borrowed, owned and lazied state).

Split from #122703
r? @petrochenkov

[rustbot]

These commits modify compiler targets.
(See the Target Tier Policy.)

[Urgau]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 5a71834 with merge 72d733c...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 72d733c (72d733c5e449a998e7007f5105cc4083e628f835)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (72d733c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.4%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.6%, secondary 0.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.7%	[4.7%, 4.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.6%	[-3.6%, -3.6%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 691.495s -> 690.854s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 326.88 MiB -> 326.75 MiB (-0.04%)

[petrochenkov]

Same as #126702, closing.
It seems the combined benchmarks in #122703 were also correct, but I still think it is worth trying the link args part as well.