Use same FxHashMap in rustdoc-json-types and librustdoc.#127456
Closed
aDotInTheVoid wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Closed
Use same FxHashMap in rustdoc-json-types and librustdoc.#127456aDotInTheVoid wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
FxHashMap in rustdoc-json-types and librustdoc.#127456aDotInTheVoid wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rustbot
added
A-rustdoc-json
Collaborator
|
rustdoc-json-types is a public (although nightly-only) API. If possible, consider changing cc @CraftSpider, @aDotInTheVoid, @Enselic, @obi1kenobi These commits modify the If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged. |
Member
Author
|
@bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 7, 2024
Use same `FxHashMap` in `rustdoc-json-types` and `librustdoc`. Reopening of rust-lang#110051, because bors has seemingly abandoned us there :'( `@bors` try r? `@ghost`
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Member
Author
|
This with more try jobs, to try to catch the thing that only happened on merge (and not try) last time @bors try |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2024
Use same `FxHashMap` in `rustdoc-json-types` and `librustdoc`. Reopening of rust-lang#110051, because bors has seemingly abandoned us there :'( try-job: dist-arm-linux try-job: dist-armhf-linux try-job: armhf-gnu try-job: test-various r? `@ghost`
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #125443) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
rustdoc-json: Use FxHashMap from rustdoc_json_types Alternative to rust-lang#110051 and rust-lang#127456. This lets us avoid rehashing the json index after building it by using the same hashmap type in construction and in rustdoc_json_types. The above PR's tried to do this by having rustdoc_json_types get the same hashmap that rustdoc has via rustc_data_structures. However, this can be made simpler if we change rustdoc instead. For the rustdoc-type republish on crates.io, I'll filter out the `pub use`, and not change the API at all. That code [already replaces the hashmap](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/blob/8d6528669ec64c2af43d1c79a228b7711cefdad7/update.sh#L11) to use the one in `std::collections` (instead of `FxHashMap`) try-job: dist-arm-linux r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
…llaumeGomez rustdoc-json: Use FxHashMap from rustdoc_json_types Alternative to rust-lang#110051 and rust-lang#127456. This lets us avoid rehashing the json index after building it by using the same hashmap type in construction and in rustdoc_json_types. The above PR's tried to do this by having rustdoc_json_types get the same hashmap that rustdoc has via rustc_data_structures. However, this can be made simpler if we change rustdoc instead. For the rustdoc-type republish on crates.io, It will filter out the `pub use`, and not change source at all. rust-lang/rustdoc-types#30. That code [already replaces the hashmap](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/blob/8d6528669ec64c2af43d1c79a228b7711cefdad7/update.sh#L11) to use the one in `std::collections` (instead of `FxHashMap`) try-job: dist-arm-linux r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
…llaumeGomez rustdoc-json: Use FxHashMap from rustdoc_json_types Alternative to rust-lang#110051 and rust-lang#127456. This lets us avoid rehashing the json index after building it by using the same hashmap type in construction and in rustdoc_json_types. The above PR's tried to do this by having rustdoc_json_types get the same hashmap that rustdoc has via rustc_data_structures. However, this can be made simpler if we change rustdoc instead. For the rustdoc-type republish on crates.io, It will filter out the `pub use`, and not change source at all. rust-lang/rustdoc-types#30. That code [already replaces the hashmap](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/blob/8d6528669ec64c2af43d1c79a228b7711cefdad7/update.sh#L11) to use the one in `std::collections` (instead of `FxHashMap`) try-job: dist-arm-linux r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 15, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129124 - aDotInTheVoid:rdj-hashmap-3, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc-json: Use FxHashMap from rustdoc_json_types Alternative to rust-lang#110051 and rust-lang#127456. This lets us avoid rehashing the json index after building it by using the same hashmap type in construction and in rustdoc_json_types. The above PR's tried to do this by having rustdoc_json_types get the same hashmap that rustdoc has via rustc_data_structures. However, this can be made simpler if we change rustdoc instead. For the rustdoc-type republish on crates.io, It will filter out the `pub use`, and not change source at all. rust-lang/rustdoc-types#30. That code [already replaces the hashmap](https://github.com/aDotInTheVoid/rustdoc-types/blob/8d6528669ec64c2af43d1c79a228b7711cefdad7/update.sh#L11) to use the one in `std::collections` (instead of `FxHashMap`) try-job: dist-arm-linux r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
Member
Author
|
Superseeded by #129124, which did it the other way around (reexport the fxhashmap from rustdoc-json-types, and use that in (bits of) librustdoc), thereby avoiding the sysroot issues that plagued this PR |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reopening of #110051, because bors has seemingly abandoned us there :'(
try-job: dist-arm-linux
try-job: dist-armhf-linux
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: test-various
r? @ghost