using correct tool mode for run-make-support crate#127677
Merged
bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Jul 14, 2024
Merged
using correct tool mode for run-make-support crate#127677bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
run-make-support crate#127677bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
onur-ozkan
commented
Jul 13, 2024
Member
|
It seems like |
We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build. Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Contributor
Author
Right, that's true. Thanks! |
08f9994 to
fc0d1dc
Compare
compiletest and run-make-support cratesrun-make-support crate
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r- I added explanation comment for compiletest's std usage. |
Contributor
Author
|
@rustbot ready |
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2024
…bzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2024
…bzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122300 (Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/dest-prop tests) - rust-lang#126967 (Promote the `wasm32-wasip2` target to Tier 2) - rust-lang#127370 (Windows: Add experimental support for linking std-required system DLLs using raw-dylib) - rust-lang#127434 (use "bootstrap" instead of "rustbuild" in comments and docs) - rust-lang#127477 (Clear `inner_attr_ranges` regularly.) - rust-lang#127558 (More attribute cleanups) - rust-lang#127659 (Use ManuallyDrop in BufWriter::into_parts) - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jhpratt
added a commit
to jhpratt/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2024
…bzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
Member
|
There was a failure in #127696 (comment) but it's not clear which PR failed it. Marking all target-specific and CI-related PRs from that rollup as iffy for now. @bors rollup=iffy |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2024
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122300 (Add FileCheck annotations to mir-opt/dest-prop tests) - rust-lang#127153 (Initial implementation of anonymous_pipe API) - rust-lang#127434 (use "bootstrap" instead of "rustbuild" in comments and docs) - rust-lang#127477 (Clear `inner_attr_ranges` regularly.) - rust-lang#127659 (Use ManuallyDrop in BufWriter::into_parts) - rust-lang#127671 (rustdoc: rename `issue-\d+.rs` tests to have meaningful names (part 8)) - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#127370 (Windows: Add experimental support for linking std-required system DLLs using raw-dylib) - rust-lang#127446 (Remove memory leaks in doctests in `core`, `alloc`, and `std`) - rust-lang#127677 (using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#127677 - onur-ozkan:use-correct-modes, r=Kobzol using correct tool mode for `run-make-support` crate We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up `x test run-make-support` invocations on a clean build.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We don't need to ensure std (and rustc) for testing run-make-support's unit tests. Using stage 0 compiler is already enough and speeds up
x test run-make-supportinvocations on a clean build.