Don't implement AsyncFn for FnDef/FnPtr that wouldnt implement Fn#128791
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Aug 9, 2024
Merged
Don't implement AsyncFn for FnDef/FnPtr that wouldnt implement Fn#128791bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
AsyncFn for FnDef/FnPtr that wouldnt implement Fn#128791bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
async-fn-unsafe
branch
from
c463ccf to
8c14c3d
Compare
Contributor
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2024
…=lcnr Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn` Due to unsafety, ABI, or the presence of target features, some `FnDef`/`FnPtr` types don't implement `Fn*`. Do the same for `AsyncFn*`. Noticed this due to rust-lang#128764, but this isn't really related to that ICE, which is fixed in rust-lang#128792.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128306 (Update NonNull::align_offset quarantees) - rust-lang#128612 (Make `validate_mir` ensure the final MIR for all bodies) - rust-lang#128648 (Add regression test) - rust-lang#128791 (Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn`) - rust-lang#128795 (Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.) - rust-lang#128825 (rm `declared_features` field in resolver) - rust-lang#128826 (Only suggest `#[allow]` for `--warn` and `--deny` lint level flags) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Member
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
compiler-errors
force-pushed
the
async-fn-unsafe
branch
from
8c14c3d to
ec1c424
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Split the test into two, so I can gate the target feature part correctly. @bors r=lcnr |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2024
…=lcnr Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn` Due to unsafety, ABI, or the presence of target features, some `FnDef`/`FnPtr` types don't implement `Fn*`. Do the same for `AsyncFn*`. Noticed this due to rust-lang#128764, but this isn't really related to that ICE, which is fixed in rust-lang#128792.
This was referenced Aug 8, 2024
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128640 (rwlock: disable 'frob' test in Miri on macOS) - rust-lang#128791 (Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn`) - rust-lang#128806 (Split `ColorConfig` off of `HumanReadableErrorType`) - rust-lang#128818 (std float tests: special-case Miri in feature detection) - rust-lang#128834 (rustdoc: strip unreachable modules) - rust-lang#128836 (rustdoc-json: add a test for impls on private & hidden types) - rust-lang#128837 (Clippy subtree update) - rust-lang#128851 (Add comment that bors did not see pushed before it merged) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#128791 - compiler-errors:async-fn-unsafe, r=lcnr Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn` Due to unsafety, ABI, or the presence of target features, some `FnDef`/`FnPtr` types don't implement `Fn*`. Do the same for `AsyncFn*`. Noticed this due to rust-lang#128764, but this isn't really related to that ICE, which is fixed in rust-lang#128792.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to unsafety, ABI, or the presence of target features, some
FnDef/FnPtrtypes don't implementFn*. Do the same forAsyncFn*.Noticed this due to #128764, but this isn't really related to that ICE, which is fixed in #128792.