Do not skip linker configuration for check builds

[Kobzol]

This essentially reverts a part of #128871, to fix #130108. This is mostly a hotfix until we can figure out a better way to both avoid rebuilds and avoid configuring the linker for x check.

Skipping linker for check builds was causing unexpected rebuilds.

Fixes: #130108

[rustbot]

r? @albertlarsan68

rustbot has assigned @albertlarsan68.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[onur-ozkan]

r=me once the CI is green

[onur-ozkan]

@bors p=1

[Kobzol]

@bors r=onur-ozkan

[bors]

📌 Commit c33aa86 has been approved by onur-ozkan

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit c33aa86 with merge 38e3a57...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: onur-ozkan
Pushing 38e3a57 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (38e3a57): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.6%	[0.6%, 0.6%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -3.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-4.1%, -2.2%]	3
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 756.978s -> 757.15s (0.02%)
Artifact size: 341.27 MiB -> 341.19 MiB (-0.02%)