Rollup of 5 pull requests#131539
Closed
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 10 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
This pulls in a bug fix relative to the 0.5.9 release which was updated-to recently.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
…-ld, r=jieyouxu Update wasm-component-ld to 0.5.10 This pulls in a bug fix relative to the 0.5.9 release which was updated-to recently.
Consider outermost const-anon in `non_local_def` lint This PR change the logic for finding the parent of the `impl` definition in the `non_local_definitions` lint to consider multiple level of const-anon items, instead of only one currently. I also took the opportunity to cleanup the related code. cc `@traviscross` Fixes rust-lang#131474
Fixing rustDoc for LayoutError. I started reading the the std lib from start to finish and noticed that this rustdoc comment wasn't correct.
…TheVoid rustdoc-json-types: fix typo in comment
…bzol move dummy commit logic into x86_64-gnu-llvm-18 Doing the dummy commit logic in a runner that uses CI-LLVM breaks in merge CI. This should be properly fixed by rust-lang#131358 (see the [actual problem](rust-lang#131448 (comment))). Since we can also fix it by moving the dummy commit into the runner where we use in-tree LLVM, so why not do that as well?
rustbot
added
A-rustdoc-json
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#131464 (Update wasm-component-ld to 0.5.10) - rust-lang#131498 (Consider outermost const-anon in `non_local_def` lint) - rust-lang#131512 (Fixing rustDoc for LayoutError.) - rust-lang#131529 (rustdoc-json-types: fix typo in comment) - rust-lang#131531 (move dummy commit logic into x86_64-gnu-llvm-18) Failed merges: - rust-lang#131476 (coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Member
Author
|
@bors retry |
bors
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
non_local_deflint #131498 (Consider outermost const-anon innon_local_deflint)Failed merges:
.cov-mapdumps #131476 (coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in.cov-mapdumps)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup