Refactor where predicates, and reserve for attributes support#132894
Refactor where predicates, and reserve for attributes support#132894bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
where predicates, and reserve for attributes support#132894Conversation
|
Changes to the size of AST and/or HIR nodes. cc @nnethercote Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy HIR ty lowering was modified cc @fmease Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
2564d04 to
78668c5
Compare
78668c5 to
d71d19e
Compare
|
@rustbot ready |
|
r? @cjgillot |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #133205) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
d71d19e to
7e9e86b
Compare
|
Changes to the size of AST and/or HIR nodes. cc @nnethercote Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo cc @ehuss |
7e9e86b to
5bb8061
Compare
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…=<try> Refactor `where` predicates, and reserve for attributes support Refactor `WherePredicate` to `WherePredicateKind`, and reserve for attributes support in `where` predicates. This is a part of rust-lang#115590 and is split from rust-lang#132388. r? petrochenkov
|
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (41a5793): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -3.1%, secondary 3.3%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 796.222s -> 798.07s (0.23%) |
5bb8061 to
161221d
Compare
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (f2abf82): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary 2.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (secondary 2.1%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 796.797s -> 795.777s (-0.13%) |
Refactor
WherePredicatetoWherePredicateKind, and reserve for attributes support inwherepredicates.This is a part of #115590 and is split from #132388.
r? petrochenkov