Use check-run-results for run-fail test stderr#133460
Use check-run-results for run-fail test stderr#133460clubby789 wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
check-run-results for run-fail test stderr#133460Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
oops, non anonymized panic strings |
a08c88b to
fa66655
Compare
|
Some changes occurred in tests/ui/sanitizer cc @rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations, @rcvalle |
fa66655 to
fe79426
Compare
|
Reverted a few tests that have more variable output |
fe79426 to
1b4e0b0
Compare
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/compiletest cc @jieyouxu |
a992f44 to
abcff47
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Hmm, we can't normalize |
abcff47 to
11b5bae
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
11b5bae to
f3a7f56
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Use `check-run-results` for `run-fail` test stderr Fixes rust-lang#65865
Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#122565 (Try to write the panic message with a single `write_all` call) - rust-lang#133460 (Use `check-run-results` for `run-fail` test stderr) - rust-lang#134627 (Avoid ICE in borrowck) - rust-lang#134799 (nits: Cleanups in `librustdoc::clean`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Use `check-run-results` for `run-fail` test stderr Fixes rust-lang#65865
Rollup of 3 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#133460 (Use `check-run-results` for `run-fail` test stderr) - rust-lang#134627 (Avoid ICE in borrowck) - rust-lang#134799 (nits: Cleanups in `librustdoc::clean`) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Use `check-run-results` for `run-fail` test stderr Fixes rust-lang#65865
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
Looks spurious @bors retry |
Use `check-run-results` for `run-fail` test stderr Fixes rust-lang#65865
|
@bors r- |
e1a9aff to
ba72e0f
Compare
|
Also leaving a comment here so discussions don't get lost elsewhere: We should be a bit careful with replacing
Concretely, this means:
|
|
Going to close; I think a blanket approach is unhelpful as it's going to be flaky (especially when stderr contains line numbers from external crates or stdlib), and doesn't provide much value |
Fixes #65865