Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ p=100 |
Collaborator
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
Prepare 1.85 beta release r? `@ghost`
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Member
Author
|
Turns out that Manually removed the broken replacement from the commit, will send a tooling change later. @bors r+ p=100 |
Collaborator
Member
Author
|
@bors rollup=never |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Member
Member
Author
|
@bors r- PR CI failed. Will investigate. |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
Prepare 1.85 beta release r? `@ghost`
Member
Author
|
Congrats bors you're broken. @bors retry |
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 7, 2025
Prepare 1.85 beta release r? `@ghost`
Collaborator
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
Member
Same error as the one encountered when preparing the previous beta version, #133447 (comment) |
Member
Author
Collaborator
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Merged
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2025
…ark-Simulacrum Revert rust-lang#131365 This PR reverts rust-lang#131365, following the revert we did on the beta branches for both 1.84 and 1.85. While the PR passes CI successfully on master, as soon as we branch off beta it starts failing in the newly created beta branch. This caused the release team to revert it for both 1.84 and 1.85, and if nothing is done it would continue being reverted every cycle. `@heiseish` (PR author) feel free to submit the PR again in the future: this revert doesn't represent the release team rejecting your change, but just a (hopefully temporary!) revert to ensure future beta branches can be created without reverting it each time. When submitting the PR again, I recommend you test your changes by configuring `rust.channel` to both `nightly` and `beta` in your `config.toml`. You can see the latest failure [here](rust-lang#135163 (comment)).
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135253 - pietroalbini:pa-revert-131365, r=Mark-Simulacrum Revert rust-lang#131365 This PR reverts rust-lang#131365, following the revert we did on the beta branches for both 1.84 and 1.85. While the PR passes CI successfully on master, as soon as we branch off beta it starts failing in the newly created beta branch. This caused the release team to revert it for both 1.84 and 1.85, and if nothing is done it would continue being reverted every cycle. `@heiseish` (PR author) feel free to submit the PR again in the future: this revert doesn't represent the release team rejecting your change, but just a (hopefully temporary!) revert to ensure future beta branches can be created without reverting it each time. When submitting the PR again, I recommend you test your changes by configuring `rust.channel` to both `nightly` and `beta` in your `config.toml`. You can see the latest failure [here](rust-lang#135163 (comment)).
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2025
…etroalbini Include rustc and rustdoc book in replace-version-placeholder This PR includes the *(stable)* rustc and rustdoc books which might contain `CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION` that should be replaced when branching beta. Include them so they are not forgotten. I didn't include any other folder or books as they don't strike me as relevant for it and might be problematic in the future if some of the submodules are turned into subtree, because we have places where we wouldn't want to replace them. cf. rust-lang#135163 (comment) cc `@pietroalbini`
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135221 - Urgau:replace-in-stable-book, r=pietroalbini Include rustc and rustdoc book in replace-version-placeholder This PR includes the *(stable)* rustc and rustdoc books which might contain `CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION` that should be replaced when branching beta. Include them so they are not forgotten. I didn't include any other folder or books as they don't strike me as relevant for it and might be problematic in the future if some of the submodules are turned into subtree, because we have places where we wouldn't want to replace them. cf. rust-lang#135163 (comment) cc `@pietroalbini`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
r? @ghost