bootstrap: Add more comments to some of the test steps#135231
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jan 9, 2025
Merged
bootstrap: Add more comments to some of the test steps#135231bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @clubby789 rustbot has assigned @clubby789. Use |
d52b7e4 to
ceabc95
Compare
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
Member
jieyouxu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! This is very helpful 🩵
Comment on lines
+1041
to
+1044
| /// Runs `src/tools/tidy` and `cargo fmt --check` to detect various style | ||
| /// problems in the repository. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// (To run the tidy tool's internal tests, use the alias "tidyselftest" instead.) |
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2025
bootstrap: Add more comments to some of the test steps Some of the test steps have names that don't clearly indicate what they actually do. While there is ongoing experimental work to actually rename the steps (e.g. rust-lang#135071), that's dependent on figuring out what the new names should actually be. In the meantime, we can still improve things by adding comments to help describe the steps, which will remain useful even after any renaming.
This was referenced Jan 8, 2025
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2025
…iaskrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128110 (Suggest Replacing Comma with Semicolon in Incorrect Repeat Expressions) - rust-lang#134609 (Add new `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-gnu` targets) - rust-lang#134875 (Implement `const Destruct` in old solver) - rust-lang#135221 (Include rustc and rustdoc book in replace-version-placeholder) - rust-lang#135231 (bootstrap: Add more comments to some of the test steps) - rust-lang#135256 (Move `mod cargo` below the import statements) Failed merges: - rust-lang#135195 (Make `lit_to_mir_constant` and `lit_to_const` infallible) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 9, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#135231 - Zalathar:test-step-notes, r=jieyouxu bootstrap: Add more comments to some of the test steps Some of the test steps have names that don't clearly indicate what they actually do. While there is ongoing experimental work to actually rename the steps (e.g. rust-lang#135071), that's dependent on figuring out what the new names should actually be. In the meantime, we can still improve things by adding comments to help describe the steps, which will remain useful even after any renaming.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some of the test steps have names that don't clearly indicate what they actually do.
While there is ongoing experimental work to actually rename the steps (e.g. #135071), that's dependent on figuring out what the new names should actually be. In the meantime, we can still improve things by adding comments to help describe the steps, which will remain useful even after any renaming.