[beta] Delay hash_extract_if stabilization from 1.87 to 1.88#139765
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:betafrom Apr 29, 2025
Merged
[beta] Delay hash_extract_if stabilization from 1.87 to 1.88#139765bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:betafrom
hash_extract_if stabilization from 1.87 to 1.88#139765bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:betafrom
Conversation
Collaborator
|
r? @ChrisDenton rustbot has assigned @ChrisDenton. Use |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Member
Author
|
@rustbot blocked |
rustbot
added
S-blocked
Member
|
r=me if/when necessary |
Member
Author
|
Merging because there still hasn't been a hashbrown release containing rust-lang/hashbrown#616, and it is now getting too late in the cycle to backport a hashbrown update that would unblock #139764. @bors r=ChrisDenton |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2025
…enton Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#139308 (add autodiff inline) - rust-lang#139656 (Stabilize `slice_as_chunks` library feature) - rust-lang#140022 (allow deref patterns to move out of boxes) - rust-lang#140276 (Do not compute type_of for impl item if impl where clauses are unsatisfied) - rust-lang#140302 (Move inline asm check to typeck, properly handle aliases) - rust-lang#140323 (Implement the internal feature `cfg_target_has_reliable_f16_f128`) - rust-lang#140391 (Rename sub_ptr to offset_from_unsigned in docs) - rust-lang#140394 (Make bootstrap git tests more self-contained) - rust-lang#140396 (Workaround for windows-gnu rust-lld test failure) - rust-lang#140402 (only return nested goals for `Certainty::Yes`) Failed merges: - rust-lang#139765 ([beta] Delay `hash_extract_if` stabilization from 1.87 to 1.88) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Contributor
|
@bors rollup=never A bit weird that bors seems to allow rolling up PRs that target different branches |
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a revert of:
hash_extract_if#134655for use in the event that we are unable to get #139764 into 1.87 (current beta).