Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats#140370
Merged
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Jun 1, 2025
Merged
Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats#140370bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
1. Better explain what the test tests 2. Test slightly more cases
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
1. Fix "expected" and the note for the pattern case 2. Add suggestions
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
WaffleLapkin
force-pushed
the
unqualified
branch
from
82f1d10 to
8f765fc
Compare
jdonszelmann
reviewed
Jun 1, 2025
| // | ||
| // If this would only add " { " and then the code below add "0: ", | ||
| // rustfix would crash, because end of this suggestion is the same as start | ||
| // of the suggestion below. Thus, we have to merge these... |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is there an issue on rustfix for that?
Contributor
|
looks good to me then! @bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2025
…elmann Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats For patterns the old diagnostic was just incorrect, but I also added machine applicable suggestions. For context, this special cases errors for `<T as Trait>::Assoc(..)` patterns and expressions (latter is just a call). Tuple struct patterns and expressions both live in the value namespace, so they are not forwarded through associated *types*. r? `@jdonszelmann` cc `@petrochenkov` in rust-lang#80080 (comment) you were wondering why it doesn't work for types, that's why — tuple patterns are resolved in the value namespace.
This was referenced Jun 1, 2025
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #140370 (Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats) - #141224 (terminology: allocated object → allocation) - #141622 (implement `va_arg` for `powerpc`) - #141666 (source_span_for_markdown_range: fix utf8 violation) - #141789 (Exclude `CARGO_HOME` from `generate-copyright` in-tree determination) - #141823 (Drive-by refactor: use `OnceCell` for the reverse region SCC graph) - #141834 (Add unimplemented `current_dll_path()` for WASI) - #141846 (Fix TLS model on bootstrap for cygwin) - #141852 (resolve if-let-chain FIXME on bootstrap) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2025
Rollup merge of #140370 - WaffleLapkin:unqualified, r=jdonszelmann Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats For patterns the old diagnostic was just incorrect, but I also added machine applicable suggestions. For context, this special cases errors for `<T as Trait>::Assoc(..)` patterns and expressions (latter is just a call). Tuple struct patterns and expressions both live in the value namespace, so they are not forwarded through associated *types*. r? ``@jdonszelmann`` cc ``@petrochenkov`` in #80080 (comment) you were wondering why it doesn't work for types, that's why — tuple patterns are resolved in the value namespace.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/miri
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang/rust#140370 (Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats) - rust-lang/rust#141224 (terminology: allocated object → allocation) - rust-lang/rust#141622 (implement `va_arg` for `powerpc`) - rust-lang/rust#141666 (source_span_for_markdown_range: fix utf8 violation) - rust-lang/rust#141789 (Exclude `CARGO_HOME` from `generate-copyright` in-tree determination) - rust-lang/rust#141823 (Drive-by refactor: use `OnceCell` for the reverse region SCC graph) - rust-lang/rust#141834 (Add unimplemented `current_dll_path()` for WASI) - rust-lang/rust#141846 (Fix TLS model on bootstrap for cygwin) - rust-lang/rust#141852 (resolve if-let-chain FIXME on bootstrap) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
to model-checking/verify-rust-std
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#140370 (Improve diagnostics for usage of qualified paths within tuple struct exprs/pats) - rust-lang#141224 (terminology: allocated object → allocation) - rust-lang#141622 (implement `va_arg` for `powerpc`) - rust-lang#141666 (source_span_for_markdown_range: fix utf8 violation) - rust-lang#141789 (Exclude `CARGO_HOME` from `generate-copyright` in-tree determination) - rust-lang#141823 (Drive-by refactor: use `OnceCell` for the reverse region SCC graph) - rust-lang#141834 (Add unimplemented `current_dll_path()` for WASI) - rust-lang#141846 (Fix TLS model on bootstrap for cygwin) - rust-lang#141852 (resolve if-let-chain FIXME on bootstrap) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For patterns the old diagnostic was just incorrect, but I also added machine applicable suggestions.
For context, this special cases errors for
<T as Trait>::Assoc(..)patterns and expressions (latter is just a call). Tuple struct patterns and expressions both live in the value namespace, so they are not forwarded through associated types.r? @jdonszelmann
cc @petrochenkov in #80080 (comment) you were wondering why it doesn't work for types, that's why — tuple patterns are resolved in the value namespace.