Port #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start/end] to the new attrib…#142921
Port #[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start/end] to the new attrib…#142921bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start/end] to the new attrib…#142921Conversation
|
|
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_data_structures Changes to the size of AST and/or HIR nodes. cc @nnethercote Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs |
46ea3f1 to
9102b14
Compare
9102b14 to
49398cf
Compare
…t, r=jdonszelmann Fix comment on NoMangle Fix comment on NoMangle. This was discussed in comments of rust-lang#142823 (comment) and rust-lang#142921
|
@bors2 try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Port `#[rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start/end]` to the new attrib… Ports `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_start` and `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_end` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for #131229 (comment) r? `@jdonszelmann`
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Rollup merge of #142922 - JonathanBrouwer:fix-rustdoc-comment, r=jdonszelmann Fix comment on NoMangle Fix comment on NoMangle. This was discussed in comments of #142823 (comment) and #142921
|
Finished benchmarking commit (600a41a): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text belowBenchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 1.5%, secondary 0.6%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 0.7%, secondary -2.4%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeResults (primary 1.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Bootstrap: 688.989s -> 689.147s (0.02%) |
49398cf to
37abd08
Compare
|
@JonathanBrouwer: 🔑 Insufficient privileges: not in try users |
|
No let's not rollup always, still want to see the final results |
|
Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use |
e6396e3 to
d5586dc
Compare
|
^ Rebased & replied to your comment |
d5586dc to
498aa7b
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #143074) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
…ute parsing infrastructure Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
498aa7b to
f98ea3d
Compare
|
r? @oli-obk |
|
@bors r+ |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
What is this?This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.Comparing f46ce66 (parent) -> 86e05cd (this PR) Test differencesShow 221 test diffsStage 1
(and 119 additional test diffs) Additionally, 2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy. Job group index Test dashboardRun cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
test-dashboard 86e05cd300fac9e83e812c4d46582b48db780d8f --output-dir test-dashboardAnd then open Job duration changes
How to interpret the job duration changes?Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (86e05cd): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary -0.8%, secondary -0.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary 2.1%, secondary -0.0%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 461.485s -> 460.931s (-0.12%) |
Ports
rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_startandrustc_layout_scalar_valid_range_endto the new attribute parsing infrastructure for #131229 (comment)r? @jdonszelmann