fix -Zmin-function-alignment on functions without attributes#142923
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Jun 24, 2025
Merged
fix -Zmin-function-alignment on functions without attributes#142923bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
-Zmin-function-alignment on functions without attributes#142923bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
the minimum function alignment was skipped on functions without attributes. That is because in our testing we generally apply `#[no_mangle]` to functions that are tested. I've added a test now that deliberately has no attributes
rustbot
added
A-attributes
Collaborator
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/codegen_attrs.rs |
Member
|
Hm. We... probably shouldn't have several hundred line loop bodies. Oh well. @bors r+ |
Collaborator
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #140985 (Change `core::iter::Fuse`'s `Default` impl to do what its docs say it does) - #141324 (std: sys: random: uefi: Provide rdrand based fallback) - #142134 (Reject unsupported `extern "{abi}"`s consistently in all positions) - #142784 (Add codegen timing section) - #142827 (Move error code explanation removal check into tidy) - #142873 (Don't suggest changing a method inside a expansion) - #142908 (Fix install-template.sh for Solaris tr) - #142922 (Fix comment on NoMangle) - #142923 (fix `-Zmin-function-alignment` on functions without attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2025
Rollup merge of #142923 - folkertdev:min-function-alignment-no-attributes, r=workingjubilee fix `-Zmin-function-alignment` on functions without attributes tracking issue: #82232 related: #142854 The minimum function alignment was skipped on functions without attributes (because the logic was in a loop that only runs if there is at least one attribute). The underlying reason we didn't catch this before is that in our testing we generally apply `#[no_mangle]` to functions that are tested. I've added a test now that deliberately has no attributes. r? `@workingjubilee`
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tracking issue: #82232
related: #142854
The minimum function alignment was skipped on functions without attributes (because the logic was in a loop that only runs if there is at least one attribute). The underlying reason we didn't catch this before is that in our testing we generally apply
#[no_mangle]to functions that are tested. I've added a test now that deliberately has no attributes.r? @workingjubilee