Update LLVM submodule

[dpaoliello]

Picks up rust-lang/llvm-project#183

r? @nikic

[dianqk]

Unlock #140136.
@bors r+ rollup=never p=1

[bors]

📌 Commit 65dc474 has been approved by dianqk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 65dc474 with merge 32cd911...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: dianqk
Pushing 32cd911 to master...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 607fbd8 (parent) -> 32cd911 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 3 test diffs

Stage 2

• [run-make] tests/run-make/compressed-debuginfo-zstd: pass -> ignore (ignored if LLVM wasn't build with zstd for ELF section compression (we want LLVM/LLD to be built with zstd support)) (J0)

Additionally, 2 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

• J0: x86_64-gnu-nopt

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 32cd9114712a24010b0583624dc52ac302194128 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2527.0s -> 3929.4s (55.5%)
2. x86_64-apple-1: 5716.5s -> 8880.1s (55.3%)
3. pr-check-1: 1527.6s -> 2358.2s (54.4%)
4. pr-check-2: 2113.3s -> 3231.9s (52.9%)
5. x86_64-gnu-tools: 3298.4s -> 4726.1s (43.3%)
6. dist-apple-various: 6251.7s -> 4154.3s (-33.5%)
7. aarch64-apple: 4327.5s -> 5690.4s (31.5%)
8. x86_64-gnu-miri: 4603.8s -> 5978.1s (29.8%)
9. dist-aarch64-linux: 8016.2s -> 5682.7s (-29.1%)
10. armhf-gnu: 4909.3s -> 6303.1s (28.4%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (32cd911): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 0.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.9%	[1.1%, 2.8%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.7%	[-1.8%, -1.7%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (secondary 3.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.5%	[3.5%, 3.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (secondary -0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Bootstrap: 464.395s -> 465.513s (0.24%)
Artifact size: 374.48 MiB -> 374.51 MiB (0.01%)