Don't evaluate the sanitizer attribute if no sanitizer is enabled#145679
Don't evaluate the sanitizer attribute if no sanitizer is enabled#1456791c3t3a wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Conversation
This is just logical as the attribute has anyways no effect in that case.
|
Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa |
|
@rustbot label +PG-exploit-mitigations |
|
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Don't evaluate the sanitizer attribute if no sanitizer is enabled
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (6fcc151): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action neededBenchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary 2.5%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (secondary -1.0%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 471.66s -> 470.248s (-0.30%) |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #147935) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
r? wesleywiser |
|
This is no longer needed, after the no-sanitize attribute was migrated to the new attributes parsing infrastructure in #145670. |
This is just logical as the attribute has anyways no effect in that case.
This is in reaction to some perf-metrics going up after #142681, specifically mentioned here: #142681 (comment).
r? rcvalle