Rollup of 3 pull requests#151535
Closed
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 19 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
Closed
Conversation
This is the conceptual opposite of the rust-cold calling convention and
is particularly useful in combination with the new `explicit_tail_calls`
feature.
For relatively tight loops implemented with tail calling (`become`) each
of the function with the regular calling convention is still responsible
for restoring the initial value of the preserved registers. So it is not
unusual to end up with a situation where each step in the tail call loop
is spilling and reloading registers, along the lines of:
foo:
push r12
; do things
pop r12
jmp next_step
This adds up quickly, especially when most of the clobberable registers
are already used to pass arguments or other uses.
I was thinking of making the name of this ABI a little less LLVM-derived
and more like a conceptual inverse of `rust-cold`, but could not come
with a great name (`rust-cold` is itself not a great name: cold in what
context? from which perspective? is it supposed to mean that the
function is rarely called?)
It is a singleton which doesn't actually need to be passed through over the bridge.
And rename FreeFunctions struct to Methods.
This fixes stage1 builds when the proc-macro bridge api changed. The rustc_proc_macro crate is identical to the proc_macro that would end up in the sysroot of the rustc compiler rustc_proc_macro is linked into.
…umbv8r, r=petrochenkov Add Tier 3 Thumb-mode targets for Armv7-A, Armv7-R and Armv8-R We currently have targets for bare-metal Armv7-R, Armv7-A and Armv8-R, but only in Arm mode. This PR adds five new targets enabling bare-metal support on these architectures in Thumb mode. This has been tested using https://github.com/rust-embedded/aarch32/compare/main...thejpster:aarch32:support-thumb-mode-v7-v8?expand=1 and they all seem to work as expected. However, I wasn't sure what to do with the maintainer lists as these are five new targets, but they share the docs page with the existing Arm versions. I can ask the Embedded Devices WG Arm Team about taking on these ones too, but whether Arm themselves want to take them on I guess is a bigger question.
…trochenkov
abi: add a rust-preserve-none calling convention
This is the conceptual opposite of the rust-cold calling convention and is particularly useful in combination with the new `explicit_tail_calls` feature.
For relatively tight loops implemented with tail calling (`become`) each of the function with the regular calling convention is still responsible for restoring the initial value of the preserved registers. So it is not unusual to end up with a situation where each step in the tail call loop is spilling and reloading registers, along the lines of:
foo:
push r12
; do things
pop r12
jmp next_step
This adds up quickly, especially when most of the clobberable registers are already used to pass arguments or other uses.
I was thinking of making the name of this ABI a little less LLVM-derived and more like a conceptual inverse of `rust-cold`, but could not come with a great name (`rust-cold` is itself not a great name: cold in what context? from which perspective? is it supposed to mean that the function is rarely called?)
…rochenkov Various refactors to the proc_macro bridge This reduces the amount of types, traits and other abstractions that are involved with the bridge, which should make it easier to understand and modify. This should also help a bit with getting rid of the type marking hack, which is complicating the code a fair bit.
rustbot
added
A-LLVM
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=5 |
Contributor
rust-bors
bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
rust-bors
bot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
💔 Test for bc4a681 failed: CI. Failed job:
|
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
r? @ghost
Create a similar rollup