bootstrap: Remove ShouldRun::paths#152196
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 2 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom Feb 6, 2026
Merged
Conversation
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2026
tshepang
reviewed
Feb 6, 2026
Member
|
Looks good, r=me after squashing the fixup commit. |
Some history about `paths()`. The original intent Mark-Simulacrum had when he introduced PathSet, to my knowledge, was that multiple paths could be aliases for the same step. That's what rustdoc is doing; both paths for rustdoc run exactly the same Step, regardless of whether one or both are present. That never really caught on. To my knowledge, rustdoc is the only usage of paths() there's ever been. Later, in 95503, I repurposed PathSet to mean "each crate in this set should be passed to Step::make_run in RunConfig". That was not the previous meaning. Rustdoc never looks at run.paths in make_run, so it's safe to just treat it as an alias, like elsewhere in bootstrap. Same for all the other tool steps. Co-authored-by: Tshepang Mbambo <hopsi@tuta.io>
Member
Author
|
fixed :) note that I don't have r+ permissions anymore. |
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Contributor
rust-bors
bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
bootstrap: Remove `ShouldRun::paths` Split out from rust-lang#151930. I've copied my comment in rust-lang#151930 (comment) into the commit description. r? @Zalathar cc @Mark-Simulacrum @Kobzol --- Some history about `paths()`. The original intent @Mark-Simulacrum had when he introduced PathSet in rust-lang@f104b12, to my knowledge, was that multiple paths could be aliases for the same step. That's what rustdoc is doing; both paths for rustdoc run exactly the same Step, regardless of whether one or both are present. That never really caught on. To my knowledge, rustdoc is the only usage of paths() there's ever been. Later, in rust-lang#95503, I repurposed PathSet to mean "each crate in this set should be passed to Step::make_run in RunConfig". That was not the previous meaning. Rustdoc never looks at run.paths in make_run, so it's safe to just treat it as an alias, like elsewhere in bootstrap. Same for all the other tool steps.
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
bootstrap: Remove `ShouldRun::paths` Split out from rust-lang#151930. I've copied my comment in rust-lang#151930 (comment) into the commit description. r? @Zalathar cc @Mark-Simulacrum @Kobzol --- Some history about `paths()`. The original intent @Mark-Simulacrum had when he introduced PathSet in rust-lang@f104b12, to my knowledge, was that multiple paths could be aliases for the same step. That's what rustdoc is doing; both paths for rustdoc run exactly the same Step, regardless of whether one or both are present. That never really caught on. To my knowledge, rustdoc is the only usage of paths() there's ever been. Later, in rust-lang#95503, I repurposed PathSet to mean "each crate in this set should be passed to Step::make_run in RunConfig". That was not the previous meaning. Rustdoc never looks at run.paths in make_run, so it's safe to just treat it as an alias, like elsewhere in bootstrap. Same for all the other tool steps.
This was referenced Feb 6, 2026
rust-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #151590 (cmse: don't use `BackendRepr` when checking return type) - #151945 (feat: Add `NonZero::<T>::from_str_radix`) - #152000 (Fix ICE in normalizing inherent associated consts with `#[type_const]`) - #152192 (Always use Xcode-provided Clang in macOS CI) - #152196 (bootstrap: Remove `ShouldRun::paths`) - #152222 (Re-add TaKO8Ki to triagebot review queue)
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2026
Rollup merge of #152196 - jyn514:remove-paths, r=Zalathar bootstrap: Remove `ShouldRun::paths` Split out from #151930. I've copied my comment in #151930 (comment) into the commit description. r? @Zalathar cc @Mark-Simulacrum @Kobzol --- Some history about `paths()`. The original intent @Mark-Simulacrum had when he introduced PathSet in f104b12, to my knowledge, was that multiple paths could be aliases for the same step. That's what rustdoc is doing; both paths for rustdoc run exactly the same Step, regardless of whether one or both are present. That never really caught on. To my knowledge, rustdoc is the only usage of paths() there's ever been. Later, in #95503, I repurposed PathSet to mean "each crate in this set should be passed to Step::make_run in RunConfig". That was not the previous meaning. Rustdoc never looks at run.paths in make_run, so it's safe to just treat it as an alias, like elsewhere in bootstrap. Same for all the other tool steps.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Split out from #151930. I've copied my comment in #151930 (comment) into the commit description.
r? @Zalathar cc @Mark-Simulacrum @Kobzol
Some history about
paths(). The original intent @Mark-Simulacrum hadwhen he introduced PathSet in f104b12, to my knowledge, was that multiple paths
could be aliases for the same step. That's what rustdoc is doing; both
paths for rustdoc run exactly the same Step, regardless of whether one
or both are present.
That never really caught on. To my knowledge, rustdoc is the only usage
of paths() there's ever been.
Later, in #95503, I repurposed PathSet to mean "each crate in this set
should be passed to Step::make_run in RunConfig". That was not the
previous meaning.
Rustdoc never looks at run.paths in make_run, so it's safe to just treat
it as an alias, like elsewhere in bootstrap. Same for all the other tool
steps.