Skip to content

Remove attribute parsing Stage#155775

Open
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 4 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:cleanup_stage
Open

Remove attribute parsing Stage#155775
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 4 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:cleanup_stage

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JonathanBrouwer JonathanBrouwer commented Apr 25, 2026

I discovered that it is surprisingly easy to remove the concept of Stage in the attribute parsers, imo this makes the code a lot cleaner.

r? @jdonszelmann
cc @mejrs @Bryntet

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 25, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 25, 2026
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer JonathanBrouwer changed the title Cleanup Stage Cleanup attribute parsing Stage Apr 25, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Apr 25, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 0f16d2c (0f16d2c2b65c0f611f58ef7ec91415060e26d515, parent: fb76025f2fe6a1c8ce03fe0931f941c8077a2c34)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@JonathanBrouwer JonathanBrouwer changed the title Cleanup attribute parsing Stage Remove attribute parsing Stage Apr 25, 2026
@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0f16d2c): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. Consider adding rollup=never if this change is not fit for rolling up.

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This perf run didn't have relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 6.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
6.1% [6.0%, 6.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.6% [2.6%, 2.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results (secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Bootstrap: 487.131s -> 486.905s (-0.05%)
Artifact size: 394.07 MiB -> 394.02 MiB (-0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 25, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors try @rust-timer queue
Made some more changes, so lets rerun to be sure

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@JonathanBrouwer JonathanBrouwer marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2026 17:09
@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 25, 2026

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred to diagnostic attributes.

cc @mejrs

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 25, 2026
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2026
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Apr 25, 2026
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@Bryntet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bryntet commented Apr 25, 2026

Wow this is a very nice change!!

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors Bot commented Apr 25, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 1605ec0 (1605ec0500eb4d5265572f443e427b9ceb0d6307, parent: fb76025f2fe6a1c8ce03fe0931f941c8077a2c34)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1605ec0): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.5% [-0.6%, -0.3%] 8
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.2% [-0.3%, -0.2%] 2

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.7%, secondary 1.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.6%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
6.2% [5.9%, 6.5%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.1% [-2.1%, -2.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-2.5%, -2.1%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.7% [-2.1%, 0.6%] 2

Cycles

Results (primary 2.4%, secondary 0.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.5% [2.0%, 3.0%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.1% [-3.1%, -3.1%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.4% [2.4%, 2.4%] 1

Binary size

Results (secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.1% [0.1%, 0.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Bootstrap: 487.131s -> 488.391s (0.26%)
Artifact size: 394.07 MiB -> 393.58 MiB (-0.12%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants