[NFC] getopts is used by librustc and librustc_driver, but isn't declared in their Cargo.toml.#54698
[NFC] getopts is used by librustc and librustc_driver, but isn't declared in their Cargo.toml.#54698DiamondLovesYou wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
getopts is used by librustc and librustc_driver, but isn't declared in their Cargo.toml.#54698Conversation
|
r? @davidtwco (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…t declared in their `Cargo.toml`.
a76fe34 to
922b9d8
Compare
|
@davidtwco Done! |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 922b9d8 has been approved by |
…idtwco [NFC] `getopts` is used by `librustc` and `librustc_driver`, but isn't declared in their `Cargo.toml`.
|
@bors r- Failed to build in |
|
@bors try Verifying if this is caused by other PRs in the rollup or this PR itself. |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
Oh well 🤷 |
| env_logger = { version = "0.5", default-features = false } | ||
| rustc-rayon = "0.1.1" | ||
| scoped-tls = { version = "0.1.1", features = ["nightly"] } | ||
| getopts = "=0.2.17" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why are these = restrictions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To keep the existing crate version, which is what is used by some other tool (not sure which). Shall I change it?
|
Ping from triage @DiamondLovesYou: It looks like some changes are required for this PR. |
|
Ping from triage @DiamondLovesYou: What is the status of this PR? |
|
Ping from triage! This PR hasn't seen any updates in a while, so I'm closing it for now, per our guidelines. Thank you for your contributions, @DiamondLovesYou, and please feel free to re-open in the future. |
No description provided.