Disable some pretty-printers when gdb is rust-enabled#55767
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Nov 23, 2018
Merged
Disable some pretty-printers when gdb is rust-enabled#55767bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
Author
|
I'm not totally sure if this will pass tests - I want to remove most of the |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 91fa486cd9b48378f6f2b0b49dbb0d157c942e58 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Member
|
@bors r- The updated test doesn't work in #55943 (comment) on i686-mingw. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Contributor
Author
Released December 2015 -- I will look tomorrow but my first inclination is to just require a newer version. |
tromey
force-pushed
the
disable-some-pretty-printers
branch
from
91fa486 to
764e2a7
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Rebased and requires gdb 7.11 -- still pre-rust but should avoid that particular failure. |
Contributor
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 764e2a7 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Member
|
@bors: rollup |
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2018
…, r=nikomatsakis Disable some pretty-printers when gdb is rust-enabled A rust-enabled gdb already knows how to display string slices, structs, tuples, and enums (and after rust-lang#54004, the pretty-printers can't handle enums at all). This patch disables these pretty-printers when gdb is rust-enabled. The "gdb-pretty-struct-and-enums-pre-gdb-7-7.rs" test is renamed, because it does not seem to depend on any behavior of that version of gdb, and because gdb 7.7 is 4 years old now.
Dylan-DPC-zz
added
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
@bors: r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 30178b4 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit 30178b4 with merge eb94cfdbd66968efbd85a3be6d4e6a3775e21639... |
Member
|
@bors: retry prioritizing beta rollup |
Member
|
@bors: retry er accidentally closed |
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit 30178b4 with merge 813de7e0c1b751e3744e76af32c4d19f082d2ad6... |
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - status-travis |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Member
|
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2018
…, r=alexcrichton Disable some pretty-printers when gdb is rust-enabled A rust-enabled gdb already knows how to display string slices, structs, tuples, and enums (and after rust-lang#54004, the pretty-printers can't handle enums at all). This patch disables these pretty-printers when gdb is rust-enabled. The "gdb-pretty-struct-and-enums-pre-gdb-7-7.rs" test is renamed, because it does not seem to depend on any behavior of that version of gdb, and because gdb 7.7 is 4 years old now.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2018
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - #55767 (Disable some pretty-printers when gdb is rust-enabled) - #55838 (Fix #[cfg] for step impl on ranges) - #55869 (Add std::iter::unfold) - #55945 (Ensure that the argument to `static_assert` is a `bool`) - #56022 (When popping in CTFE, perform validation before jumping to next statement to have a better span for the error) - #56048 (Add rustc_codegen_ssa to sysroot) - #56091 (Fix json output in the self-profiler) - #56097 (Fix invalid bitcast taking bool out of a union represented as a scalar) - #56116 (ci: Download clang/lldb from tarballs) - #56120 (Add unstable Literal::subspan().) - #56154 (Pass additional linker flags when targeting Fuchsia) - #56162 (std::str Adapt documentation to reality) - #56163 ([master] Backport 1.30.1 release notes) - #56168 (Fix the tracking issue for hash_raw_entry) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Collaborator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A rust-enabled gdb already knows how to display string slices,
structs, tuples, and enums (and after #54004, the pretty-printers
can't handle enums at all). This patch disables these pretty-printers
when gdb is rust-enabled.
The "gdb-pretty-struct-and-enums-pre-gdb-7-7.rs" test is renamed,
because it does not seem to depend on any behavior of that version of
gdb, and because gdb 7.7 is 4 years old now.