Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module#56996
Conversation
|
r? @KodrAus (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
eb29deb to
80c67d3
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
80c67d3 to
2e48674
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
2e48674 to
28f8c72
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
sad trombone @bors retry |
|
I honestly don't know how to fix the error here. I was under the impression that you could set the stability of an export differently from the original, but that might have changed. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #56407) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
28f8c72 to
48e732b
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
It's a bit unfortunate. How about we punt on the feature gate, decide in #55002 whether the name should be |
src/libcore/sync/atomic.rs
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any reason not to deprecate this one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because if the other name is unstable, then you can't actually use the replacement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah of course :) I'd already put myself in the mindset that this would be stable.
|
Do you think that it would be worthwhile simply doing an FCP here to name the replacement I can update the PR to make the renamed version instantly stable and deprecate the old one, if that's desired. |
Sure, let's do that 👍 @rfcbot doesn't actually like me though so I'll just give the libs team a ping. cc @rust-lang/libs what do you think about deprecating If we don't want the insta-stable |
|
That's a good idea-- I'll update the PR to do that regardless and we can decide whether to insta-stabilise or not. |
|
I think it's fine to deprecate the one in |
dfc1289 to
10696c6
Compare
|
@bors retry |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
10696c6 to
24ca530
Compare
|
Fixed broken link; should be ready to merge now. Also if someone could add the appropriate tags to the tracking issue I'd appreciate it. |
|
@bors r+ Thanks @clarcharr! I'll update the tracking issue. |
|
📌 Commit 24ca530 has been approved by |
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in rust-lang#55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in rust-lang#55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in rust-lang#55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
Move spin_loop_hint to core::hint module As mentioned in #55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have `_hint` in its name.
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor |
As mentioned in #55002. The new name is kept unstable to decide whether the function should have
_hintin its name.