Conversation
|
I love this. :) r=me with the nit fixed. However, there are other parts of #58486 that are still viable, right? Like, some of the simplifications in |
|
Hm, I thought It is a bit sad that we need the |
Co-Authored-By: oli-obk <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
|
Awesome. I love this PR. :) @bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 1fe7eb0 has been approved by |
|
💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.
|
|
📌 Commit 1fe7eb0 has been approved by |
Const to op simplification r? @RalfJung alternative to rust-lang#58486
Const to op simplification r? @RalfJung alternative to rust-lang#58486
Const to op simplification r? @RalfJung alternative to rust-lang#58486
Const to op simplification r? @RalfJung alternative to rust-lang#58486
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - #57364 (Improve parsing diagnostic for negative supertrait bounds) - #58183 (Clarify guarantees for `Box` allocation) - #58442 (Simplify the unix `Weak` functionality) - #58454 (Refactor Windows stdio and remove stdin double buffering ) - #58511 (Const to op simplification) - #58642 (rustdoc: support methods on primitives in intra-doc links) Failed merges: r? @ghost
r? @RalfJung
alternative to #58486