Closed
Conversation
Since there is nothing to optimise there...
…oerister Use informational target machine for metadata Since there is nothing to optimise there... Should fix rust-lang#58323 but haven’t tested locally. r? @michaelwoerister
rust-lldb: fix crash when printing empty string Fixes rust-lang#52185. ~Re-enables the pretty-std debuginfo test and tweaks the test as necessary to get it to pass again. This reveals that lldb's formatting of enums is broken (rust-lang#58492). I also removed the emoji from the test because I couldn't get the docker image's gdb to print the emoji, just octal escapes (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53154/files#r208263904).~
Put Local, Static and Promoted as one Base variant of Place Related to rust-lang#52708 The `Place` 2.0 representation use a `Base` variant for `Local`, `Static` and `Promoted` so we start making this change in the current `Place` to make the following steps simpler. r? @oli-obk
…scottmcm
Have all methods of Filter and FilterMap use internal iteration
This PR changes `Filter::{next, next_back, count}` and `FilterMap::{next, next_back}` to all use internal iteration. The `next` and `next_back` methods are changed to directly forward to `try_for_each` and `try_rfold` respectively, using `Result` as the `Try` type. I think that's okay? Alternatively, I could change their implementations to use `LoopState` instead if there's any benefit in doing so.
r? @scottmcm
Replace `s` with `self` in docs for str methods taking self. Cherry picked from PR rust-lang#58596 which is blocked on some intra-doc link bugs.
allow specifying attributes for tool lints Needed for clippy to fix `unused_doc_comments` warnings that will be exposed by rust-lang#57882 (and thus unblock it).
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r+ p=6 |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit e53a8bd has been approved by |
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit e53a8bd with merge 15391d0c9d924ceb6d3f30a5b55ec1a5058cbbb8... |
Collaborator
|
💔 Test failed - checks-travis |
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #57760) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
swithselfin docs for str methods taking self. #58782 (Replaceswithselfin docs for str methods taking self.)Failed merges:
r? @ghost