Remove boxed closures in address parser.#67085
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @KodrAus (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup Thanks! I confirmed that as best as I can tell we're still issuing the reads atomically and avoiding the allocation here seems like a good thing as well. |
|
📌 Commit 79f8764 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
…mulacrum Remove boxed closures in address parser. Simplify address parser by removing unnecessary boxed closures. Also relevant for rust-lang/rfcs#2832.
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - #66846 (Make try_mark_previous_green aware of cycles.) - #66959 (Remove potential cfgs duplicates) - #66988 (Fix angle bracket formatting when dumping MIR debug vars) - #66998 (Modified the testcases for VxWorks) - #67008 (rustdoc: Add test for fixed issue) - #67023 (SGX: Fix target linker used by bootstrap) - #67033 (Migrate to LLVM{Get,Set}ValueName2) - #67049 (Simplify {IoSlice, IoSliceMut}::advance examples and tests) - #67054 (codegen "unreachable" for invalid SetDiscriminant) - #67081 (Fix Query type docs) - #67085 (Remove boxed closures in address parser.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
5 participants
Simplify address parser by removing unnecessary boxed closures.
Also relevant for rust-lang/rfcs#2832.