Fix Instance::resolve() incorrectly returning specialized instances#67662
Conversation
9cb8cb7 to
d88a745
Compare
8525d2d to
4cfd5c4
Compare
|
@oli-obk I assume that closing #67631 implies this should also fix the test failure I have in #67137, but rebasing onto @wesleywiser's branch still yields a failure for me :(. |
We only want to return specializations when `Reveal::All` is passed, not when `Reveal::UserFacing` is. Resolving this fixes several issues with the `ConstProp`, `SimplifyBranches`, and `Inline` MIR optimization passes. Fixes rust-lang#66901
4cfd5c4 to
25a8b5d
Compare
|
Force pushed |
|
Hi @anp do you have the error details so I can look at them? |
|
It's the same error that highfive reports: |
|
I guess we still need my PR for backwards compatibility of @anp's PR. I'll reopen |
|
I have no idea why your PR would change that test's behavior but I wonder if we shouldn't have |
|
I think oli said at one point that it would be a breaking change to allow const prop to surface this error? |
this is the problem, the use of the broken constant inside a never used function should not cause a hard error. |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 25a8b5d has been approved by |
| let eligible = if !resolved_item.defaultness.is_default() { | ||
| true | ||
| } else if param_env.reveal == traits::Reveal::All { | ||
| !trait_ref.needs_subst() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You might want an assert that !trait_ref.needs_infer().
Use Reveal::All in MIR optimizations Resolves some code review feedback in rust-lang#67662. Fixes rust-lang#68855 r? @eddyb
Use Reveal::All in MIR optimizations Resolves some code review feedback in rust-lang#67662. Fixes rust-lang#68855 r? @eddyb
Use Reveal::All in MIR optimizations Resolves some code review feedback in rust-lang#67662. Fixes rust-lang#68855 r? @eddyb
We only want to return specializations when
Reveal::Allis passed, notwhen
Reveal::UserFacingis. Resolving this fixes several issues withthe
ConstProp,SimplifyBranches, andInlineMIR optimizationpasses.
Fixes #66901
Rebased on top of #67631
r? @oli-obk