Revert #65244 for performance reasons

[wesleywiser]

This reverts commit f35517e.

Revert #65244 so we can see if it is the cause of the performance issue in #67706

cc #67644

[rust-highfive]

r? @zackmdavis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

[wesleywiser]

r? @ghost

@bors try

@rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 717702d with merge 5671b03c0b64dbbec704a3846ddc7966a6a7eb59...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-azure
Build commit: 5671b03c0b64dbbec704a3846ddc7966a6a7eb59 (5671b03c0b64dbbec704a3846ddc7966a6a7eb59)

[rust-timer]

Queued 5671b03c0b64dbbec704a3846ddc7966a6a7eb59 with parent 119307a, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking try commit 5671b03c0b64dbbec704a3846ddc7966a6a7eb59, comparison URL.

[wesleywiser]

Per compiler team triage meeting (see #67706 (comment)), I'm reopening this for merging.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+ p=1 rollup=never

Approving this per compiler team decision and prioritizing as a regression fix. Also marking as no-rollup since we want to avoid the fixes here masking some other regression.

[bors]

📌 Commit 717702d has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 717702d with merge 4877e16...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-azure
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 4877e16 to master...