rustc_span: Add Symbol::to_ident_string for use in diagnostic messages#69491
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Feb 28, 2020
Merged
rustc_span: Add Symbol::to_ident_string for use in diagnostic messages#69491bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Symbol::to_ident_string for use in diagnostic messages#69491bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
petrochenkov
force-pushed
the
symprint
branch
from
3bd89c4 to
6ce5ab6
Compare
Member
|
r=me implementation wise Is it intended that we'll file a E-easy or so cleanup issue to try and track down cases where this should be called (instead of, e.g., the Display impl on symbol?). I'm fine with not doing so in this PR, to be clear, just want to make sure that work is not lost. |
Member
|
cc @rust-lang/wg-diagnostics too, I guess |
Contributor
Author
#69053 is the tracking issue (or at least the place where the discussion happens) and @olegnn is working on applying this to specific diagnostics. @bors r=Mark-Simulacrum rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 6ce5ab6 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2020
…acrum rustc_span: Add `Symbol::to_ident_string` for use in diagnostic messages Covers the same error reporting use case (rust-lang#69387 (comment)) as the `Display` impl for `Ident`. cc rust-lang#69053 Follow-up to rust-lang#69387. r? @Mark-Simulacrum
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #60826 (Implement new gdb/lldb pretty-printers) - #69255 (Add more context to E0599 errors) - #69379 (Fail on multiple declarations of `main`.) - #69430 (librustc_typeck: remove loop that never actually loops) - #69449 (Do not ping PR reviewers in toolstate breakage) - #69491 (rustc_span: Add `Symbol::to_ident_string` for use in diagnostic messages) - #69495 (don't take redundant references to operands) - #69496 (use find(x) instead of filter(x).next()) Failed merges: r? @ghost
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2020
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #69379 (Fail on multiple declarations of `main`.) - #69430 (librustc_typeck: remove loop that never actually loops) - #69449 (Do not ping PR reviewers in toolstate breakage) - #69491 (rustc_span: Add `Symbol::to_ident_string` for use in diagnostic messages) - #69495 (don't take redundant references to operands) - #69496 (use find(x) instead of filter(x).next()) - #69501 (note that find(f) is equivalent to filter(f).next() in the docs.) - #69527 (Ignore untracked paths when running `rustfmt` on repository.) - #69529 (don't use .into() to convert types into identical types.) Failed merges: r? @ghost
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Covers the same error reporting use case (#69387 (comment)) as the
Displayimpl forIdent.cc #69053
Follow-up to #69387.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum