Only run dataflow for const qualification if type-based check would fail#71330
Merged
bors merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Apr 25, 2020
Merged
Only run dataflow for const qualification if type-based check would fail#71330bors merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
bors merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @varkor (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Contributor
Author
|
r? @oli-obk |
Contributor
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
4 tasks
oli-obk
reviewed
Apr 22, 2020
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we can lower Drop terminators for types that have a const Drop bound to a function call before doing this analysis.
Contributor
|
So... hypothetically we could now have a situation where const checking does not cause a cycle error anymore, optimizations eliminate the cycle error and then const eval (which runs on optimized MIR) does not cause a cycle error? |
Contributor
Author
|
That's correct. I think the solution is to explicitly trigger |
Contributor
Author
|
Sidebar: what do you think about renaming a few modules/types in |
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #71044) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Contributor
I have a branch for that that I'm rebasing since yesterday |
Contributor
|
So yea, I'm in favour of liberally renaming modules and types to match our terminology better or just be more consistent |
Contributor
|
r=me on this PR after a rebase |
ecstatic-morse
force-pushed
the
const-qualif-lazy
branch
from
f32568c to
a6bb156
Compare
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #71467) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
This was needed by an early version of dataflow-based const qualification where `QualifCursor` needed to return a full `BitSet` with the current state.
ecstatic-morse
force-pushed
the
const-qualif-lazy
branch
from
a6bb156 to
15f95b1
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r=oli-obk |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 15f95b1 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2020
…=oli-obk Only run dataflow for const qualification if type-based check would fail This is the optimization discussed in rust-lang#49146 (comment). We wait for `Qualif::in_any_value_of_ty` to return `true` before running dataflow. For bodies that deal mostly with primitive types, this will avoid running dataflow at all during const qualification. This also removes the `BitSet` used to cache `in_any_value_of_ty` for each local, which was only necessary for an old version of rust-lang#64470 that also handled promotability.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#69456 (fix misleading type annotation diagonstics) - rust-lang#71330 (Only run dataflow for const qualification if type-based check would fail) - rust-lang#71480 (Improve PanicInfo examples readability) - rust-lang#71485 (Add BinaryHeap::retain as suggested in rust-lang#42849) - rust-lang#71512 (Remove useless "" args) - rust-lang#71527 (Miscellaneous cleanup in `check_consts`) - rust-lang#71534 (Avoid unused Option::map results) - rust-lang#71535 (Fix typos in docs for keyword "in") Failed merges: r? @ghost
Member
I'd be happy to see that happen. :D |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the optimization discussed in #49146 (comment). We wait for
Qualif::in_any_value_of_tyto returntruebefore running dataflow. For bodies that deal mostly with primitive types, this will avoid running dataflow at all during const qualification.This also removes the
BitSetused to cachein_any_value_of_tyfor each local, which was only necessary for an old version of #64470 that also handled promotability.