Conversation
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #82045) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
r? @KodrAus |
00e117d to
dd3db70
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #81172) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
KodrAus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR @lukaslueg! 🙇
I hope you don't mind I've just pushed a couple commits to your branch to fix a merge conflict and update the stable version to 1.52.0.
Would you be happy to squash these commits down?
r=me after that
2acb30d to
e292e6e
Compare
|
Squashed it all |
|
ping @KodrAus |
|
📌 Commit 8af15db has been approved by |
…JohnTitor Stabilize `peekable_peek_mut` Resolves rust-lang#78302. Also adds some documentation on `std::iter::Iterator::peekable()` regarding the new method. The feature was added in rust-lang#77491 in Nov' 20, which is recently, but the feature seems reasonably small. Never did a stabilization-pr, excuse my ignorance if there is a protocol I'm not aware of.
|
Isn't there usually a vote on stabilizing things, especially since this indirectly affects |
Hm, I thought they meant we didn't require it, @KodrAus is it wrong? |
|
@bors r- I'd rather we don't accidentally stabilize, and I think an FCP seems appropriate here. |
Resolves rust-lang#78302 Update peekable.rs Update library/core/src/iter/traits/iterator.rs Co-authored-by: Ashley Mannix <kodraus@hey.com>
8af15db to
abcbe54
Compare
|
Rebased due to #83349 |
|
🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔 |
|
The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete. As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed. The RFC will be merged soon. |
Co-authored-by: Alexander Ronald Altman <alexanderaltman@me.com>
|
It seems that the review suggestions by @JohnTitor didn't actually get applied? |
Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
Co-authored-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
👀 Thanks for spotting this. I have no idea why these commits slipped through, maybe during rebase. |
|
@bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit cfe43f9 has been approved by |
Stabilize `peekable_peek_mut` Resolves rust-lang#78302. Also adds some documentation on `std::iter::Iterator::peekable()` regarding the new method. The feature was added in rust-lang#77491 in Nov' 20, which is recently, but the feature seems reasonably small. Never did a stabilization-pr, excuse my ignorance if there is a protocol I'm not aware of.
Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80733 (Improve links in inline code in `core::pin`.) - rust-lang#81764 (Stabilize `rustdoc::bare_urls` lint) - rust-lang#81938 (Stabilize `peekable_peek_mut`) - rust-lang#83980 (Fix outdated crate names in compiler docs) - rust-lang#83992 (Merge idents when generating source content) - rust-lang#84001 (Update Clippy) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Resolves #78302. Also adds some documentation on
std::iter::Iterator::peekable()regarding the new method.The feature was added in #77491 in Nov' 20, which is recently, but the feature seems reasonably small. Never did a stabilization-pr, excuse my ignorance if there is a protocol I'm not aware of.