Conversation
(cherry picked from commit ee0e841)
Fixes rust-lang#82156 (cherry picked from commit 9889e44)
It is possible for different tests to collide to the same TestDesc when macros are involved. That is a bug, but it didn’t cause a panic until rust-lang#81367. For now, change the code to ignore this problem. Fixes rust-lang#81852. Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu> (cherry picked from commit 1605af0)
…ss crates It should be never break another crate to re-export a public item. Note that this doesn't check the feature gate at *all* for other crates: - Feature-gates aren't currently serialized, so the only way to check the gate is with ad-hoc attribute checking. - Checking the feature gate twice (once when documenting the original crate and one when documenting the current crate) seems not great. This should still catch using the feature most of the time though, since people tend to document their own crates. (cherry picked from commit fdb32e9)
(cherry picked from commit 3be69b1)
Fix rust-lang#82455. (cherry picked from commit 5ad6088)
This submodule update reverts <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81803>. While that change is meant to fix a real bug, [LLVM PR42623], it caused new permission errors on Windows 7 that make it unable to build any archives. This is probably the same root cause as [LLVM PR48378]. Fixes rust-lang#81051. We'll file a new Rust issue to track the LLVM resolution. [LLVM PR42623]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42623 [LLVM PR48378]: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48378 (cherry picked from commit 31814c4)
Contributor
|
Some changes occurred in intra-doc-links. cc @jyn514 |
Contributor
|
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
Thanks! If you could drop the beta-accepted label from each PR and update the milestone to 1.51 either once this lands or now (either is fine) that'd be great. @bors r+ rollup=never p=1 |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit ee71761 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Member
Author
I thought we kept |
Member
|
Er, yes, that's correct, sorry. |
Member
Author
|
OK, they're updated now! |
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
11 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This backports some beta-accepted PRs and one additional LLVM fix for s390x.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum