Remove duplicated fn(Box<[T]>) -> Vec<T>#84248
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Apr 23, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
r? @kennytm (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
|
r? @Amanieu |
Amanieu
reviewed
Apr 20, 2021
calebsander
force-pushed
the
refactor/vec-functions
branch
from
aa38c1a to
9db5466
Compare
calebsander
force-pushed
the
refactor/vec-functions
branch
from
9db5466 to
f505d61
Compare
Member
|
@bors r+ rollup |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit f505d61 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2021
… r=Amanieu Remove duplicated fn(Box<[T]>) -> Vec<T> `<[T]>::into_vec()` does the same thing as `Vec::from::<Box<[T]>>()`, so they can be implemented in terms of each other. This was the previous implementation of `Vec::from()`, but was changed in rust-lang#78461. I'm not sure what the rationale was for that change, but it seems preferable to maintain a single implementation.
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2021
… r=Amanieu Remove duplicated fn(Box<[T]>) -> Vec<T> `<[T]>::into_vec()` does the same thing as `Vec::from::<Box<[T]>>()`, so they can be implemented in terms of each other. This was the previous implementation of `Vec::from()`, but was changed in rust-lang#78461. I'm not sure what the rationale was for that change, but it seems preferable to maintain a single implementation.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2021
Rollup of 11 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#80805 (Improve `Iterator::by_ref` example) - rust-lang#84248 (Remove duplicated fn(Box<[T]>) -> Vec<T>) - rust-lang#84321 (rustdoc: Convert sub-variant toggle to HTML) - rust-lang#84359 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#84374 (Clean up .gitignore) - rust-lang#84387 (Move `sys_common::poison` to `sync::poison`) - rust-lang#84430 (doc/platform-support: clarify UEFI support) - rust-lang#84433 (Prevent control, shift and alt keys to make search input lose focus) - rust-lang#84444 (doc: Get rid of "[+] show undocumented items" toggle on numeric From impls) - rust-lang#84456 (Fix ICE if original_span(fn_sig) returns a span not in body sourcefile) - rust-lang#84469 (Update comment on `PrimTy::name_str`) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
<[T]>::into_vec()does the same thing asVec::from::<Box<[T]>>(), so they can be implemented in terms of each other. This was the previous implementation ofVec::from(), but was changed in #78461. I'm not sure what the rationale was for that change, but it seems preferable to maintain a single implementation.