Add expansion to while desugar spans#88175
Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Oct 4, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy. cc @rust-lang/clippy |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 48ac8c81573c25dd73a3f6fe0ba57b089b5799fb has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
camsteffen
force-pushed
the
let-desugar-span
branch
2 times, most recently
from
11d1e6c to
15e8b4c
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Fix formatting @bors r=Manishearth |
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r=Manishearth |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 15e8b4c7a9c087d36c1c09bafb33d7f0ebbb0ad4 has been approved by |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
camsteffen
force-pushed
the
let-desugar-span
branch
from
15e8b4c to
4d4a4af
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
camsteffen
force-pushed
the
let-desugar-span
branch
from
4d4a4af to
aedc947
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Tweaked some error handling to maintain test output. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
camsteffen
force-pushed
the
let-desugar-span
branch
from
aedc947 to
4e76930
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@rustbot ready |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
inquisitivecrystal
added
A-clippy
T-compiler
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #87688) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
camsteffen
force-pushed
the
let-desugar-span
branch
from
4e76930 to
86d8cb2
Compare
JohnCSimon
added
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #89328) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
camsteffen
force-pushed
the
let-desugar-span
branch
from
86d8cb2 to
67ea84d
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Hey @Manishearth, I'm awaiting your review since I added some changes after your first review. |
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 67ea84d has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Collaborator
|
Finished benchmarking commit (e737694): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2021
…earth Add expansion to while desugar spans In the same vein as rust-lang#88163, this reverts a change in Clippy behavior as a result of rust-lang#80357 (and reverts some `#[allow]`s): This changes `clippy::blocks_in_if_conditions` to not fire on `while` loops. Though we might actually want Clippy to lint those cases, we should introduce the change purposefully, with tests, and possibly under a different lint name. The actual change here is to add a desugaring expansion to the spans when lowering a `while` loop. r? `@Manishearth`
flip1995
added a commit
to flip1995/rust-clippy
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2021
Before this lint didn't trigger on macros. With rust-lang/rust#88175 this isn't enough anymore. In this PR a `WhileLoop` desugaring kind was introduced. This overrides the span of expanded expressions when lowering the while loop. So if a while loop is in a macro, the expressions that it expands to are no longer marked with `ExpnKind::Macro`, but with `ExpnKind::Desugaring`. In general, this is the correct behavior and the same that is done for `ForLoop`s. It just tripped up this lint.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/rust-clippy
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2021
…steffen Don't trigger semicolon_if_nothing_returned in expanded code Fixes #7768 Before, this lint didn't trigger on macros. With rust-lang/rust#88175 this isn't enough anymore. In this PR a `WhileLoop` desugaring kind was introduced. This overrides the span of expanded expressions when lowering the while loop. So if a while loop is in a macro, the expressions that it expands to are no longer marked with `ExpnKind::Macro`, but with `ExpnKind::Desugaring`. In general, this is the correct behavior and the same that is done for `ForLoop`s. It just tripped up this lint. r? `@camsteffen` changelog: [`semicolon_if_nothing_returned`]: Fix regression on macros containing while loops
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
10 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the same vein as #88163, this reverts a change in Clippy behavior as a result of #80357 (and reverts some
#[allow]s): This changesclippy::blocks_in_if_conditionsto not fire onwhileloops. Though we might actually want Clippy to lint those cases, we should introduce the change purposefully, with tests, and possibly under a different lint name.The actual change here is to add a desugaring expansion to the spans when lowering a
whileloop.r? @Manishearth