Conversation
This commit also updates `stdarch` git submodule.
This is a follow-up from rust-lang#91645, regarding [some remarks I made](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/join!/near/264293660). Mainly: - it hides the recursive munching through a private `macro`, to avoid leaking such details (a corollary is getting rid of the need to use `@` to disambiguate); - it uses a `match` binding, _outside_ the `async move` block, to better match the semantics from function-like syntax; - it pre-pins the future before calling into `poll_fn`, since `poll_fn`, alone, cannot guarantee that its capture does not move; - it uses `.ready()?` since it's such a neat pattern; - it renames `Took` to `Taken` for consistency with `Done`.
Co-Authored-By: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
…` point
```
error[E0759]: `self` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:10:24
|
LL | pub async fn start(&self) {
| ^^^^^ this data with an anonymous lifetime `'_`...
...
LL | require_static(async move {
| -------------- ...is required to live as long as `'static` here...
LL | &self;
| ----- ...and is captured here
|
note: `'static` lifetime requirement introduced by this trait bound
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:2:22
|
LL | fn require_static<T: 'static>(val: T) -> T {
| ^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0759`.
```
Fix rust-lang#72312.
* take diagnostic logic out of happy-path * sort/dedup once * add more comments
More accurate filtering still needed.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Henry-Mantilla <daniel.henry.mantilla@gmail.com>
In Rust, nesting method calls with both require `&mut` access to `self`
produces a borrow-check error:
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable more than once at a time
--> src/lib.rs:7:14
|
7 | self.foo(self.bar());
| ---------^^^^^^^^^^-
| | | |
| | | second mutable borrow occurs here
| | first borrow later used by call
| first mutable borrow occurs here
That's because Rust has a left-to-right evaluation order, and the method
receiver is passed first. Thus, the argument to the method cannot then
mutate `self`.
There's an easy solution to this error: just extract a local variable
for the inner argument:
let tmp = self.bar();
self.foo(tmp);
However, the error doesn't give any suggestion of how to solve the
problem. As a result, new users may assume that it's impossible to
express their code correctly and get stuck.
This commit adds a (non-structured) suggestion to extract a local
variable for the inner argument to solve the error. The suggestion uses
heuristics that eliminate most false positives, though there are a few
false negatives (cases where the suggestion should be emitted but is
not). Those other cases can be implemented in a future change.
Suggest using a temporary variable to fix borrowck errors Fixes rust-lang#77834. In Rust, nesting method calls with both require `&mut` access to `self` produces a borrow-check error: error[E0499]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable more than once at a time --> src/lib.rs:7:14 | 7 | self.foo(self.bar()); | ---------^^^^^^^^^^- | | | | | | | second mutable borrow occurs here | | first borrow later used by call | first mutable borrow occurs here That's because Rust has a left-to-right evaluation order, and the method receiver is passed first. Thus, the argument to the method cannot then mutate `self`. There's an easy solution to this error: just extract a local variable for the inner argument: let tmp = self.bar(); self.foo(tmp); However, the error doesn't give any suggestion of how to solve the problem. As a result, new users may assume that it's impossible to express their code correctly and get stuck. This commit adds a (non-structured) suggestion to extract a local variable for the inner argument to solve the error. The suggestion uses heuristics that eliminate most false positives, though there are a few false negatives (cases where the suggestion should be emitted but is not). Those other cases can be implemented in a future change.
Point at capture points for non-`'static` reference crossing a `yield` point
```
error[E0759]: `self` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:10:24
|
LL | pub async fn start(&self) {
| ^^^^^ this data with an anonymous lifetime `'_`...
...
LL | require_static(async move {
| -------------- ...is required to live as long as `'static` here...
LL | &self;
| ----- ...and is captured here
|
note: `'static` lifetime requirement introduced by this trait bound
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:2:22
|
LL | fn require_static<T: 'static>(val: T) -> T {
| ^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0759`.
```
Fix rust-lang#72312.
Make `Borrow` and `BorrowMut` impls `const` Tracking issue: rust-lang#91522
Const `Option::cloned` This constifies the two `Option::cloned` functions, bounded on `~const Clone`.
…anieu Add spin_loop hint for RISC-V architecture This commit uses the PAUSE instruction (rust-lang/stdarch#1262) to implement RISC-V spin loop, and updates `stdarch` submodule to use the merged PAUSE instruction.
…triplett Minor improvements to `future::join!`'s implementation This is a follow-up from rust-lang#91645, regarding [some remarks I made](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/join!/near/264293660). Mainly: - it hides the recursive munching through a private `macro`, to avoid leaking such details (a corollary is getting rid of the need to use ``@`` to disambiguate); - it uses a `match` binding, _outside_ the `async move` block, to better match the semantics from function-like syntax; - it pre-pins the future before calling into `poll_fn`, since `poll_fn`, alone, cannot guarantee that its capture does not move (to clarify: I believe the previous code was sound, thanks to the outer layer of `async`. But I find it clearer / more robust to refactorings this way 🙂). - it uses `@ibraheemdev's` very neat `.ready()?`; - it renames `Took` to `Taken` for consistency with `Done` (tiny nit 😄). ~~TODO~~Done: - [x] Add unit tests to enforce the function-like `:value` semantics are respected. r? `@nrc`
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
|
📌 Commit ed81098 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (928783d): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
Successful merges:
'staticreference crossing ayieldpoint #89734 (Point at capture points for non-'staticreference crossing ayieldpoint)BorrowandBorrowMutimplsconst#90270 (MakeBorrowandBorrowMutimplsconst)Option::cloned#90741 (ConstOption::cloned)future::join!'s implementation #91721 (Minor improvements tofuture::join!'s implementation)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup