Conversation
See rust-lang#91867 for more information.
…ult-methods, r=oli-obk Mark defaulted `PartialEq`/`PartialOrd` methods as const WIthout it, `const` impls of these traits are unpleasant to write. I think this kind of change is allowed now. although it looks like it might require some Miri tweaks. Let's find out. r? ```@fee1-dead```
…estebank Improve suggestion to change struct field to &mut r? ``@estebank`` Now displays a proper underline style suggestion instead of including the code change inline with the message.
Remove `in_band_lifetimes` for `rustc_passes` rust-lang#91867
…=lnicola ⬆️ rust-analyzer r? ```@ghost```
…aflow, r=nagisa Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_mir_dataflow` See rust-lang#91867 for more information.
…d, r=kennytm Revert "socket ancillary data implementation for dragonflybsd." Reverts rust-lang#91553
Update stdlib to the 2021 edition progress towards rust-lang#88638 I couldnt find a way to run the 2018 style panic tests against 2018 so I just deleted them, maybe theres a way to do it that I missed though?
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=7 |
|
📌 Commit efbefb6 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (d3f3004): comparison url. Summary: This change led to large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
Successful merges:
PartialEq/PartialOrdmethods as const #91439 (Mark defaultedPartialEq/PartialOrdmethods as const)in_band_lifetimesforrustc_passes#91896 (Removein_band_lifetimesforrustc_passes)in_band_lifetimesfromrustc_mir_dataflow#91922 (Removein_band_lifetimesfromrustc_mir_dataflow)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup