Skip to content

htmldocck: Add support for /text() in @snapshot#92914

Merged
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
camelid:snapshot-text
Jan 18, 2022
Merged

htmldocck: Add support for /text() in @snapshot#92914
bors merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
camelid:snapshot-text

Conversation

@camelid
Copy link
Member

@camelid camelid commented Jan 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This allows just testing the text, in cases where the HTML tags don't
matter.

See #92908 (comment) for an example of when this would be useful.

r? @GuillaumeGomez

@rustbot rustbot added the T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Jan 15, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 15, 2022
@camelid camelid added the A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc label Jan 15, 2022
@camelid
Copy link
Member Author

camelid commented Jan 15, 2022

cc @jsha: I think this should mitigate your concern about @snapshot leading to brittle tests?

camelid
camelid commented Jan 15, 2022
View reviewed changes
src/etc/htmldocck.py Outdated
Comment on lines +500 to +503
Copy link
Member Author

@camelid camelid Jan 15, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This duplicates code elsewhere in htmldocck.

@camelid camelid mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2022
Merged
@jsha
Copy link
Contributor

jsha commented Jan 15, 2022

How does this differ from our current XPath checks, where the stuff between the quotes is a text match? E.g.:

// @has cap_lints/index.html //* 'Crate cap_lints'
// @has cap_lints/struct.Foo.html //* 'Foo'

Also, is /text() valid XPath? Or does this move us further from a standard XPath deployment?

@camelid
Copy link
Member Author

camelid commented Jan 15, 2022 •
edited
Loading

How does this differ from our current XPath checks, where the stuff between the quotes is a text match? E.g.:

It makes the checks more readable and enables diffing and blessing (rather than just saying "XPath not found").

Also, is /text() valid XPath? Or does this move us further from a standard XPath deployment?

Yes, /text() is valid XPath. Also, /text() is already supported by @has, in a similarly hacky way.

@camelid
Copy link
Member Author

camelid commented Jan 15, 2022

An example of how the old way is not very readable:

// @has macro_generated_macro/macro.linebreak.html //pre 'macro_rules! linebreak {'
// @has - //pre '    ('
// @has - //pre '        <= 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25'
// @has - //pre '        26 27 28 =>'
// @has - //pre '    ) => { ... };'
// @has - //pre '};'

from an old version of #92908.

@jsha
Copy link
Contributor

jsha commented Jan 15, 2022

Looks good to me, then! I'll wait for @GuillaumeGomez to review, since they know these tests better than I.

GuillaumeGomez
GuillaumeGomez reviewed Jan 15, 2022
View reviewed changes
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

GuillaumeGomez commented Jan 15, 2022

Yes, that seems good to me.

On a somewhat similar topic: it'd be nice that we merged #89676 at some point to really support XPath completely... Currently it's very hacky and pretty bad.

@camelid
htmldocck: Add support for /text() in @snapshot
9c6d8ef 
This allows just testing the text, in cases where the HTML tags don't
matter.
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

GuillaumeGomez commented Jan 16, 2022

I'm fine with this dd. Could you maybe a test making use of it please?

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 17, 2022

Is it good enough that I'll be adding tests making use of it in #92908?

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

GuillaumeGomez commented Jan 17, 2022

That sounds good to me!

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 17, 2022

📌 Commit 9c6d8ef has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 17, 2022
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2022
Merged
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2022
@bors
Auto merge of rust-lang#93021 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-o7z8zoe, r=matthi…
7531d2f 
…askrgr

Rollup of 14 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92629 (Pick themes on settings page, not every page)
 - rust-lang#92640 (Fix ICEs related to `Deref<Target=[T; N]>` on newtypes)
 - rust-lang#92701 (Add some more attribute validation)
 - rust-lang#92803 (Hide mobile sidebar on some clicks)
 - rust-lang#92830 (Rustdoc style cleanups)
 - rust-lang#92866 ("Does exists" typos fix)
 - rust-lang#92870 (add `rustc_diagnostic_item` attribute to `AtomicBool` type)
 - rust-lang#92914 (htmldocck: Add support for `/text()` in ``@snapshot`)`
 - rust-lang#92923 (Abstract the pretty printer's ringbuffer to be infinitely sized)
 - rust-lang#92946 (Exclude llvm-libunwind from the self-contained set on s390x-musl targets)
 - rust-lang#92947 (rustdoc: Use `intersperse` in a `visit_path` function)
 - rust-lang#92997 (Add `~const` bound test for negative impls)
 - rust-lang#93004 (update codegen test for LLVM 14)
 - rust-lang#93016 (Stabilize vec_spare_capacity)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#92924 (Delete pretty printer tracing)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit be3d25b into rust-lang:master Jan 18, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Jan 18, 2022
@camelid camelid deleted the snapshot-text branch January 18, 2022 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez approved these changes

Assignees

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez

Labels

A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.60.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@camelid @jsha @GuillaumeGomez @dtolnay @bors @rust-highfive @rustbot