Rollup of 4 pull requests#94717
Closed
matthiaskrgr wants to merge 11 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Daniel Henry-Mantilla <daniel.henry.mantilla@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mark Rousskov <mark.simulacrum@gmail.com>
Add Result::{ok, err, and, or, unwrap_or} as const
Already opened tracking issue rust-lang#92384.
I don't think that this should actually cause any issues as long as the constness is unstable, but we may want to double-check that this doesn't get interpreted as a weird `Drop` bound even for non-const usages.
…without-arg, r=Mark-Simulacrum Remove argument from closure in thread::Scope::spawn. This implements `@danielhenrymantilla's` [suggestion](rust-lang#93203 (comment)) for improving the scoped threads interface. Summary: The `Scope` type gets an extra lifetime argument, which represents basically its own lifetime that will be used in `&'scope Scope<'scope, 'env>`: ```diff - pub struct Scope<'env> { .. }; + pub struct Scope<'scope, 'env: 'scope> { .. } pub fn scope<'env, F, T>(f: F) -> T where - F: FnOnce(&Scope<'env>) -> T; + F: for<'scope> FnOnce(&'scope Scope<'scope, 'env>) -> T; ``` This simplifies the `spawn` function, which now no longer passes an argument to the closure you give it, and now uses the `'scope` lifetime for everything: ```diff - pub fn spawn<'scope, F, T>(&'scope self, f: F) -> ScopedJoinHandle<'scope, T> + pub fn spawn<F, T>(&'scope self, f: F) -> ScopedJoinHandle<'scope, T> where - F: FnOnce(&Scope<'env>) -> T + Send + 'env, + F: FnOnce() -> T + Send + 'scope, - T: Send + 'env; + T: Send + 'scope; ``` The only difference the user will notice, is that their closure now takes no arguments anymore, even when spawning threads from spawned threads: ```diff thread::scope(|s| { - s.spawn(|_| { + s.spawn(|| { ... }); - s.spawn(|s| { + s.spawn(|| { ... - s.spawn(|_| ...); + s.spawn(|| ...); }); }); ``` <details><summary>And, as a bonus, errors get <em>slightly</em> better because now any lifetime issues point to the outermost <code>s</code> (since there is only one <code>s</code>), rather than the innermost <code>s</code>, making it clear that the lifetime lasts for the entire <code>thread::scope</code>. </summary> ```diff error[E0373]: closure may outlive the current function, but it borrows `a`, which is owned by the current function --> src/main.rs:9:21 | - 7 | s.spawn(|s| { - | - has type `&Scope<'1>` + 6 | thread::scope(|s| { + | - lifetime `'1` appears in the type of `s` 9 | s.spawn(|| println!("{:?}", a)); // might run after `a` is dropped | ^^ - `a` is borrowed here | | | may outlive borrowed value `a` | note: function requires argument type to outlive `'1` --> src/main.rs:9:13 | 9 | s.spawn(|| println!("{:?}", a)); // might run after `a` is dropped | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: to force the closure to take ownership of `a` (and any other referenced variables), use the `move` keyword | 9 | s.spawn(move || println!("{:?}", a)); // might run after `a` is dropped | ++++ " ``` </details> The downside is that the signature of `scope` and `Scope` gets slightly more complex, but in most cases the user wouldn't need to write those, as they just use the argument provided by `thread::scope` without having to name its type. Another downside is that this does not work nicely in Rust 2015 and Rust 2018, since in those editions, `s` would be captured by reference and not by copy. In those editions, the user would need to use `move ||` to capture `s` by copy. (Which is what the compiler suggests in the error.)
…sumption, r=Mark-Simulacrum promot debug_assert to assert Fixes rust-lang#94705
update Miri Fixes rust-lang#94687 r? `@rust-lang/miri`
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=4 |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit de31dcf has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
|
⌛ Testing commit de31dcf with merge ca7974eb890beb0933293c9b57be6cc26782a646... |
Member
|
@bors r- retry Miri is broken by some very recently landing changes. Sorry for that. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Member
|
Lol we clicked that button the same time.^^ |
Member
|
creating a new rollup already :P don't race me there xD |
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
Collaborator
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup