[perf test/don't merge] Revert "RustWrapper: add missing include"

[matthiaskrgr]

This reverts commit 185e3b9.
cc #94814 (comment)

r? @ghost

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 1146ecd with merge 8a8cc149d565af08f8e5921bdda595ceff446e5f...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 8a8cc149d565af08f8e5921bdda595ceff446e5f (8a8cc149d565af08f8e5921bdda595ceff446e5f)

[rust-timer]

Queued 8a8cc149d565af08f8e5921bdda595ceff446e5f with parent af446e1, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (8a8cc149d565af08f8e5921bdda595ceff446e5f): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

[apiraino]

Changing labels to signal that it not yet ready for review

@rustbot label -S-waiting-on-review +S-experimental