Revert "Use implicit capture syntax in format_args"

[Dylan-DPC]

This reverts #93950

part of diagnosis of perf regression in #94824

r? @ghost

[Dylan-DPC]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 7a40b31 with merge c1977ae272a2d0d09f7907dc9fd57776366e9ae2...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: c1977ae272a2d0d09f7907dc9fd57776366e9ae2 (c1977ae272a2d0d09f7907dc9fd57776366e9ae2)

[rust-timer]

Queued c1977ae272a2d0d09f7907dc9fd57776366e9ae2 with parent 4ca56d2, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (c1977ae272a2d0d09f7907dc9fd57776366e9ae2): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. 4 results were found to be statistically significant but too small to be relevant.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression