Revert "Fix intra doc link ICE when trying to get traits in scope for primitive"

[GuillaumeGomez]

Reverts #95645

This is only to confirm that the perf drop comes from this PR.

r? @GuillaumeGomez

[GuillaumeGomez]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-timer]

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 572f335 with merge fed203b29ae7e76c9b96595df5873057c19cac46...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: fed203b29ae7e76c9b96595df5873057c19cac46 (fed203b29ae7e76c9b96595df5873057c19cac46)

[rust-timer]

Queued fed203b29ae7e76c9b96595df5873057c19cac46 with parent 634770c, future comparison URL.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (fed203b29ae7e76c9b96595df5873057c19cac46): comparison url.

Summary:

• Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found
• Secondary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvements found

	Regressions 😿 (primary)	Regressions 😿 (secondary)	Improvements 🎉 (primary)	Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	All 😿 🎉 (primary)
count1	0	1	2	9	2
mean2	N/A	0.3%	-20.6%	-18.2%	-20.6%
max	N/A	0.3%	-24.4%	-24.2%	-24.4%

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Footnotes

1. number of relevant changes ↩

2. the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩