Fix running bootstrap tests on a fresh clone#96375
Conversation
|
(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 0079aad has been approved by |
…-Simulacrum Fix running bootstrap tests on a fresh clone In rust-lang#96303, I changed the tests not to manage submodules, with the main goal of avoiding a clone for llvm-project. Unfortunately, there are some tests which depend on submodules - I didn't notice locally because they were already checked out for me, and CI doesn't use submodule handling at all. Fresh clones, however, were impacted: ``` failures: ---- builder::tests::defaults::doc_default stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_dir(builder.src.join(&relative_path).join("redirects")) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/doc.rs:232:21 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ---- builder::tests::dist::dist_only_cross_host stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_to_string(&toml_file_name) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1314:20 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` Try and get the best of both worlds by only checking out the submodules actually used in tests.
…-Simulacrum Fix running bootstrap tests on a fresh clone In rust-lang#96303, I changed the tests not to manage submodules, with the main goal of avoiding a clone for llvm-project. Unfortunately, there are some tests which depend on submodules - I didn't notice locally because they were already checked out for me, and CI doesn't use submodule handling at all. Fresh clones, however, were impacted: ``` failures: ---- builder::tests::defaults::doc_default stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_dir(builder.src.join(&relative_path).join("redirects")) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/doc.rs:232:21 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ---- builder::tests::dist::dist_only_cross_host stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_to_string(&toml_file_name) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1314:20 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` Try and get the best of both worlds by only checking out the submodules actually used in tests.
…-Simulacrum Fix running bootstrap tests on a fresh clone In rust-lang#96303, I changed the tests not to manage submodules, with the main goal of avoiding a clone for llvm-project. Unfortunately, there are some tests which depend on submodules - I didn't notice locally because they were already checked out for me, and CI doesn't use submodule handling at all. Fresh clones, however, were impacted: ``` failures: ---- builder::tests::defaults::doc_default stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_dir(builder.src.join(&relative_path).join("redirects")) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/doc.rs:232:21 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ---- builder::tests::dist::dist_only_cross_host stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_to_string(&toml_file_name) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1314:20 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` Try and get the best of both worlds by only checking out the submodules actually used in tests.
…-Simulacrum Fix running bootstrap tests on a fresh clone In rust-lang#96303, I changed the tests not to manage submodules, with the main goal of avoiding a clone for llvm-project. Unfortunately, there are some tests which depend on submodules - I didn't notice locally because they were already checked out for me, and CI doesn't use submodule handling at all. Fresh clones, however, were impacted: ``` failures: ---- builder::tests::defaults::doc_default stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_dir(builder.src.join(&relative_path).join("redirects")) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/doc.rs:232:21 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ---- builder::tests::dist::dist_only_cross_host stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_to_string(&toml_file_name) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1314:20 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` Try and get the best of both worlds by only checking out the submodules actually used in tests.
…-Simulacrum Fix running bootstrap tests on a fresh clone In rust-lang#96303, I changed the tests not to manage submodules, with the main goal of avoiding a clone for llvm-project. Unfortunately, there are some tests which depend on submodules - I didn't notice locally because they were already checked out for me, and CI doesn't use submodule handling at all. Fresh clones, however, were impacted: ``` failures: ---- builder::tests::defaults::doc_default stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_dir(builder.src.join(&relative_path).join("redirects")) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/doc.rs:232:21 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ---- builder::tests::dist::dist_only_cross_host stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_to_string(&toml_file_name) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1314:20 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` Try and get the best of both worlds by only checking out the submodules actually used in tests.
|
⌛ Testing commit 0079aad with merge 40332fabac1f85c350885fe5c8cb2b784314851b... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
@bors retry I hope this is a spurious failure, but not sure. It could be because of the modifications in this PR, though I don't see an immediate reason for why that would be. |
|
@bors try |
|
⌛ Trying commit b8588cb095964da6c443af8d7e626ad1f81ce040 with merge b1a76e6c973e7dfdaa813dcf7d33e6444b356ef4... |
|
and for future try runs, in case this one fails and you need try again @bors delegate+ (ofc don't r+ though) |
|
✌️ @jyn514 can now approve this pull request |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
In rust-lang#96303, I changed the tests not to manage submodules, with the main goal of avoiding a clone for llvm-project. Unfortunately, there are some tests which depend on submodules - I didn't notice locally because they were already checked out for me, and CI doesn't use submodule handling at all. Fresh clones, however, were impacted: ``` failures: ---- builder::tests::defaults::doc_default stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_dir(builder.src.join(&relative_path).join("redirects")) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/doc.rs:232:21 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ---- builder::tests::dist::dist_only_cross_host stdout ---- thread 'main' panicked at 'fs::read_to_string(&toml_file_name) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)', src/bootstrap/lib.rs:1314:20 note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace ``` Try and get the best of both worlds by only checking out the submodules actually used in tests.
b8588cb to
212fc21
Compare
|
Ok cool, this should be fixed - the problem was that ninja isn't installed on all CI builders. The fix was to disable all codegen backends, since we just need the @bors r=Mark-Simulacrum (already approved above: #96375 (comment)) |
|
📌 Commit 212fc21 has been approved by |
|
⌛ Testing commit 212fc21 with merge a7efc92e97920ee2812b494ee44ee68a863e2f86... |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
Spurious failure: @bors retry |
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (532be94): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression |
In #96303, I changed the tests not to manage submodules, with the main
goal of avoiding a clone for llvm-project. Unfortunately, there are some tests
which depend on submodules - I didn't notice locally because they were already checked out for me,
and CI doesn't use submodule handling at all. Fresh clones, however, were impacted:
Try and get the best of both worlds by only checking out the submodules actually used in tests.