Prefer visibility map parents that are not doc(hidden) first#99698
Prefer visibility map parents that are not doc(hidden) first#99698bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
doc(hidden) first#99698Conversation
|
r? @cjgillot (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
The best way to access the attributes on a |
not sure how hard this is in rustc_metadata, but rustdoc does it like so: rust/src/librustdoc/visit_ast.rs Lines 51 to 59 in e1d1848 |
…gillot Prefer visibility map parents that are not `doc(hidden)` first Far simpler approach to rust-lang#98876. This only fixes the case where the parent is `doc(hidden)`, not where the child is `doc(hidden)` since I don't know how to get the attrs on the import statement given a `ModChild`... I'll try to follow up with that, but this is a good first step.
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#98583 (Stabilize Windows `FileTypeExt` with `is_symlink_dir` and `is_symlink_file`) - rust-lang#99698 (Prefer visibility map parents that are not `doc(hidden)` first) - rust-lang#99700 (Add a clickable link to the layout section) - rust-lang#99712 (passes: port more of `check_attr` module) - rust-lang#99759 (Remove dead code from cg_llvm) - rust-lang#99765 (Don't build std for *-uefi targets) - rust-lang#99771 (Update pulldown-cmark version to 0.9.2 (fixes url encoding for some chars)) - rust-lang#99775 (rustdoc: do not allocate String when writing path full name) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
@compiler-errors any chance that this contributed to the regression reported in #99792 (comment) ? |
|
Yes very likely. |
Far simpler approach to #98876.
This only fixes the case where the parent is
doc(hidden), not where the child isdoc(hidden)since I don't know how to get the attrs on the import statement given aModChild... I'll try to follow up with that, but this is a good first step.