Fix many typos#104
Open
chu11 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Seems to be happening with gcc 12.2.0-3ubuntu1: ``` lightningd/jsonrpc.c: In function ‘destroy_json_command’: lightningd/jsonrpc.c:1180:63: error: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘false’ for the address of ‘canary’ will never be NULL [-Werror=address] lightningd/jsonrpc.c:108:53: note: ‘canary’ declared here ``` Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Fix many typos / spelling errors found with catch-ci typos tool.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix many typos / spelling errors found with catch-ci typos tool.
We recently tried to add some typo checking into our project and found a bunch in ccan. Went ahead and fixed more of them beyond the ones we use.
Some judgement calls on ones not to fix, like RFCs which I figure were copied from ietf. Two fixes were within code, which I hope is ok (local variable spelled wrong, static internal function name spelled wrong). Everything else is typos in comments or documentation.