Remove label_break_value feature#1061
Closed
jhpratt wants to merge 1 commit intorwf2:masterfrom
jhpratt:no-label-break-value
Closed
Remove label_break_value feature#1061jhpratt wants to merge 1 commit intorwf2:masterfrom jhpratt:no-label-break-value
label_break_value feature#1061jhpratt wants to merge 1 commit intorwf2:masterfrom
jhpratt:no-label-break-value
Conversation
This amounts to creating a `loop` that only runs once through. If this feature ever stabilizes (which seems unlikely at this point), it will be trivial to revert this to the previous state.
Collaborator
|
My |
Contributor
Author
|
Yeah, I just preferred the |
Contributor
Author
|
Closing in favor of #1060, which also removes unused feature gates. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This amounts to creating a
loopthat only runs once through.If this feature ever stabilizes (which seems unlikely at this point), it
will be trivial to revert this to the previous state.