Skip to content

🧪 [Testing] Add tests for invalid base64 JWT handling#82

Open
ryodocx wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test-invalid-jwt-base64-17295434107574999988
Open

🧪 [Testing] Add tests for invalid base64 JWT handling#82
ryodocx wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
test-invalid-jwt-base64-17295434107574999988

Conversation

@ryodocx

@ryodocx ryodocx commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: The testing gap addressed is the missing error test for an invalid base64 JWT payload when parsing the Authorization header.
📊 Coverage: The new test covers scenarios for an invalid base64 JWT, an invalid JSON JWT, and a valid JWT happy path.
Result: Test coverage is improved and reliability increases as the tests simulate the error path when processing the Authorization header.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 17295434107574999988 started by @ryodocx

Add `handler_test.go` and use `httptest` to cover testing for valid and invalid base64 JWT handling.
Adds explicit test cases for invalid base64 strings and invalid JSON content in the JWT payload.

Co-authored-by: ryodocx <4597213+ryodocx@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant