ci: split lint-and-format into separate jobs and enforce 100% coverage#4
Merged
Conversation
Split the lint-and-format CI job into lint, format, type-check, and test jobs so each check runs and reports independently. Add Vitest coverage reporting with a 100% threshold and upload results to Codecov. Also removes an unreachable defensive branch in webhookTreeProvider.ts's groupByBranch that coverage analysis surfaced; behavior is unchanged (existing tests still pass).
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests. ℹ️ You can also turn on project coverage checks and project coverage reporting on Pull Request comment Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
lint-and-formatCI job intolint,format,type-check, andtestso the job name matches what it actually runswebhookTreeProvider.ts'sgroupByBranchthat coverage analysis surfaced (behavior unchanged)Test plan
npm run lint,npm run format:check,npm run compilepassnpm run test:coveragepasses with 100% statements/branches/functions/lines (verified under WSL, matching CI's ubuntu-latest)