Open
Conversation
- Sync Correctness - Error Handling Patterns - Security & Auth Review Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds Continue AI checks to run on every PR, providing automated code review for areas that require judgment beyond what linters and type checkers can catch.
Checks
docs/SYNC.md. Catches source-of-truth violations, idempotency breaks, and cursor/watermark issues.anyhowvsthiserror, proper error context propagation, no silent failures, and daemon resilience (one session's error shouldn't crash the loop).Why these checks?
These target the three highest-impact areas identified from codebase analysis:
Learn more: docs.continue.dev
Continue Tasks: ✅ 2 no changes — View all