refactor(model): remove config discovery log statement

[AnnatarHe]

Remove the slog.InfoContext call that logged discovered config files in ReadConfigFile function to reduce verbosity.

Fixes #184

---

Generated with Claude Code

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @AnnatarHe, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the configuration service by removing a specific log statement. The slog.InfoContext call, which previously logged details about discovered configuration files, has been eliminated from the ReadConfigFile function. This change is intended to reduce log verbosity and improve the overall clarity of the application's logging output, addressing an issue where these logs were deemed excessive.

Highlights

• Logging Reduction: Removed a verbose slog.InfoContext call that logged discovered configuration files within the ReadConfigFile function.
• Improved Log Clarity: The change aims to reduce unnecessary log output, making the logs less verbose and easier to parse for critical information.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request removes an informational log statement about discovered configuration files to reduce verbosity. While this change achieves its goal, I've suggested an alternative approach. Instead of removing the log statement entirely, changing its level to Debug would also reduce verbosity for most users while preserving valuable information for debugging purposes. This provides more flexibility for consumers of this package to control log output.

I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.

model/config.go (203-210)

While removing this log statement reduces verbosity, it also removes information that could be valuable for debugging configuration-related issues. A better approach might be to change the log level from Info to Debug. This would hide the message in production environments (where the log level is typically Info or higher) but keep it available for debugging when needed. This gives consumers of the library more control over log verbosity.

	slog.DebugContext(
		ctx,
		"Discovered config files",
		slog.String("base", files.baseFile),
		slog.String("local", files.localFile),
		slog.String("base_format", string(files.baseFormat)),
		slog.String("local_format", string(files.localFormat)),
	)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	19.46% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
model/config.go	61.90% <ø> (-1.97%)	⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.