Conversation
Replaced hardcoded mock secrets in example blocks with obvious placeholders like YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET, YOUR_API_KEY, and YOUR_PASSWORD. This helps prevent security scanners from incorrectly flagging these docstring examples as actual leaked credentials.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
🎯 What: Replaced hardcoded dummy secrets (e.g.,
client_secret="secret",password="password") with clear placeholders (e.g.,YOUR_CLIENT_SECRET,YOUR_PASSWORD) in the docstring examples ofsrc/google/adk/auth/auth_credential.py.🛡️ Solution: Updated the docstrings to use descriptive placeholder variables (e.g.,
YOUR_API_KEY,YOUR_TOKEN) instead of literal string secrets. This standardizes the documentation and prevents security scanners from flagging the file. Verified the Pydantic models continue to compile and validate properly.PR created automatically by Jules for task 18110983432951370169 started by @shivan4030